Page 191 - Global Project Management Handbook
P. 191

COMPETENCIES OF PROJECT MANAGERS          8-17

        ● PMSGB/SAQA: National Certificate in Generic Project Management (Project Administration
          and Coordination) at NQF Level 4 (South Africa)
        ● PMI PMCDF: Project Manager Competency Development Framework (2002) (PMI)

           The primary focus in selecting performance-based competency standards was on those
        standards and/or guidelines that were developed in the context of nationally endorsed qual-
        ifications frameworks. Such standards have been developed as a basis for criterion-based
        assessment of workplace performance, and those available at the time the research was
        conducted were those of Australia, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. The PMI’s
        Project Manager Competency Development Framework was also included because its for-
        mat is similar to that of the government-endorsed performance-based standards.
                                         17
           Review and comparison of these standards identified 48 concepts or topics, of which
        18 were represented at the topic level in all eight of the documents reviewed. These may
        be considered core topics:
        ● Change control
        ● Cost management
        ● Document management
        ● Information/communication management
        ● Procurement
        ● Project closeout/finalization
        ● Project context/environment
        ● Project initiation/startup
        ● Project planning
        ● Project monitoring and control
        ● Quality management
        ● Reporting
        ● Resource management
        ● Risk management
        ● Time management/scheduling/planning

        ● Stakeholder/relationship management
        ● Team building/development/teamwork
        ● Work content and scope management
           In developing the performance-based standards, the underlying assumption was that
        regardless of the range of responsibilities, project managers at the threshold level of com-
        petence are expected to produce essentially the same result—outputs and outcomes that
        are acceptable to relevant stakeholders. However, they will be required to do this in dif-
        fering contexts. The CIFTER table (see Table 8.1) was developed as a basis for identify-
        ing roles based on the nature and context of projects. From this it was determined that
        there should be two levels of project manager standards, Global Level 1 and Global Level 2,
        where the Global Level 2 project manager would be operating in a more senior role and a
        more complex environment.
           Through a series of working sessions, issue of exposure drafts, and review and response
        to feedback over a two-year period, performance-based standards were developed for these
        two levels of project manager, Global Level 1 and Global Level 2, and ready for public
        release in March 2006. There are six units in the standards:
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196