Page 180 - Glucose Monitoring Devices
P. 180

182    CHAPTER 9 Calibration of CGM systems




                         Two approaches to optimize the computational complexity
                         Most of the algorithms proposed for improving CGM performance employ sophis-
                         ticated models and signal processing features that, although still allowing the imple-
                         mentation on wearable devices/smartphones, increase the computational complexity
                         and processing delay compared to the simple linear regression techniques. With the
                         aim of reducing the delay due to signal processing, Mahmoudi et al. proposed a
                         multistep calibration algorithm based on rate-limiting filtering, selective smoothing,
                         and robust regression [37]. The rate-limiting filter limits the rate of change if a phys-
                         iological threshold is exceeded; the selective smoothing is applied if the signal is
                         noisy, that is, if the number of zero crossings of the signal first-order differences
                         exceeds a predefined threshold; the robust regression then converts the raw measured
                         current to BG levels using reference SMBG measurements (for a maximum of four
                         references per day). The application of the filtering step to only the noisy parts of the
                         signal lowered the delay introduced by the signal processing of the CGM profile.
                            Another approach that has low computational complexity as a major strength
                         was proposed by Kirchsteiger and colleagues employing linear matrix inequalities
                         techniques, resulting in convex optimization problems of low complexity [38,39].
                         The authors proposed two different parametric descriptions of the relationship
                         between IG and BG and a constructive algorithm to adaptively estimate the unknown
                         parameters. The algorithm explicitly considers the measurement uncertainty of the
                         device used to collect the calibration measurements, which was first pointed out by
                         Choleau and colleagues [18]. Moreover, the algorithm embeds an automatic feature
                         to detect fingerprick measurements, which are not suitable to be used for calibration.


                         Deconvolution-based Bayesian approach
                         The uncertainty in the reference SMBG samples used for calibration is a key issue in
                         the development of robust calibration algorithms. The real-time deconvolution-
                         based approach proposed by Guerra et al. [40] demonstrated its robustness against
                         both temporal misplacement of the SMBG references and uncertainty in the BG-
                         to-IG kinetics model. The authors proposed a real-time signal-enhancement module
                         to be applied to the CGM sensor output to improve the accuracy of the device. The
                         algorithm compensates the distortion due to the BG-to-IG dynamic by means of
                         regularized deconvolution [41] and relies on a linear regression model that is
                         updated each time a pair of SMBG references is collected. Significant accuracy
                         improvements were observed both on simulated and real datasets. The
                         deconvolution-based approach of [40] was further developed in Refs. [42,43], where
                         it was directly applied to the raw measured signal rather than in cascade to the CGM
                         sensor output. The algorithm fits the raw current signal against BG references
                         (collected twice a day) using a time-varying linear calibration function whose
                         parameters are identified in the Bayesian framework using a priori knowledge on
                         their statistical distribution. The BG-to-IG kinetics is compensated, as in
                         Ref. [40], via nonparametric deconvolution. Results showed significant accuracy
                         improvements compared to the manufacturer calibration.
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185