Page 364 - Handbook of Materials Failure Analysis
P. 364

362    CHAPTER 14 Fatigue failure analysis of welded structures




                         a combination of modes I and II SIFs (such as double-shear and tensile-shear
                         configuration, Figure 14.2). The parameter β should be found such that the best cor-
                                                                       ; when plotted versus the
                         relation is achieved for equivalent stress intensities, K I eq
                         fatigue life for all specimen configurations.
                            A geometrical correction factor, G, was defined to incorporate the effects of spec-
                         imen and nugget size

                                                      s ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                                                        2

                                                        t W 9t 2
                                                   G ¼         +1 ;                     (14.4)
                                                        r 3  4r 2
                         where t is the sheet thickness, and W is the specimen width. To account for the effect
                         of load ratio, R, the general stress intensity parameter, K i , was defined as
                                                           p
                                                        K I eq  ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                                                     K i ¼   1 R:                       (14.5)
                                                         G
                         The parameter K i was related to the fatigue life by a linear relationship in the log-
                         log scale.
                            The fracture mechanics approach in general has a number of advantages and
                         drawbacks. The main advantage of this approach is that the crack propagation pro-
                         cess may be closely followed. A drawback of this approach is that the nugget edge is
                         considered a crack and therefore crack initiation life is assumed insignificant, which
                         is not supported by experimental observations and analysis. The work by Swellam
                         et al. [15] shows that crack initiation life in spot-welds of a low-carbon steel over-
                         whelms the crack propagation life in the high-cycle fatigue regime, that is, life > 10 5
                         cycles. McMahon et al. [34] demonstrated that up to 55% of the total fatigue life of
                         spot-welds can be consumed by crack initiation. This ratio in the work by Sheppard
                         et al. [22] is 30%. It should be mentioned that the crack initiation life is the number of
                         cycles required for the crack to reach a length of 18% of the sheet thickness in Swel-
                         lam’s work [15], and 0.25 mm in the studies by McMahon et al. and Sheppard et al.
                         [22,34]. Another deficiency associated with the fracture mechanics approach is that
                         the formulations are based on the assumption that the crack is along the faying sur-
                         face, while according to experiments, through-thickness cracking is the most com-
                         mon fatigue failure mode for tensile-shear specimens [13,35–37]. Moreover, in
                         contrast to the assumption in this approach, primary cracks in some cases do not ini-
                         tiate from the nugget edge [29,37].


                         2.2 STRUCTURAL STRESS APPROACH
                         Since 1989, a number of fatigue models have been developed for spot-welds based
                         on the structural stress concept. The structural stress takes into account all the stress
                         concentrations, except the stress concentrations originating from the weld [9,38].
                         Structural stress reflects the effects of forces and moments at the spot-weld center
                         or edge, and theoretically may be defined in the plate or nugget depending on the
                         mode of failure. Therefore, structural stress has been considered as the factor which
                         controls the fatigue failure. The structural stress approach, as opposed to many
   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369