Page 175 - Handbook of Surface Improvement and Modification
P. 175

170                                                The Coefficient of Friction


                                                        faces (solid-solid adhesion, liquid-
                                                        mediated  adhesion,  dry  friction,
                                                        wet friction, and friction models −
                                                        all  illustrated  with  examples  and
                                                                           1
                                                        mathematical equations.
                                                            Macro-scale surface patterns
                                                        are often used to improve gripping
                                                                  3
                                                        and  sliding.   Polyacetal  samples
                                                        with  micron-scale  surface  struc-
                                                        tures were examined to determine
                                                        their effects on the sliding friction
                                                        and  compared  with  similarly  pat-
            Figure 11.5. Correlation between elastic modulus, crystallinity, and   terned  polypropylene.   Dynamic
                                                                          3
            coefficient of friction in copolymers 6/12. [Adapted, by permis-
            sion, from Álvarez-Láinez, ML; Palacio, JA, Wear, 372-373, 76-  friction levels depended on surface
            80, 2017.]                                  pressure.  The micro-pattern influ-
                                                               3
                                                        enced friction at low loads (a fric-
                                                        tion  minimum  at  the  surface
                                                        pressure  range  of  0.5-1  MPa  for
                                                                         3
                                                        both  PP  and  POM).  Figure  11.4
                                                        shows that the main wear mecha-
                                                        nism for both patterned materials
                                                        is  a  plastic  deformation  of  the
                                                        micro-bump   tops   producing
                                                                    3
                                                        shaved debris.  It can be deduced
                                                        that flake-like wear debris do not
                                                                             3
                                                        stick  to  wearing  surface.  Lower
                                                        contact  area  causes  a  decrease  in
                                                        friction  as  long  as  the  high  load
            Figure 11.6. Set-up of the tribology cell. [Adapted, by permission,
            from Álvarez-Láinez, ML; Palacio, JA, Wear, 372-373, 76-80,   does  not  flatten  the  entire  struc-
                                                            3
            2017.]                                      ture.
                                                            PA-6  crystallinity  and  elas-
                                                     4
            ticity modulus are higher than the values for PA-12.  At the same time, the friction coeffi-
                                              4
            cient in PA-6 is lower than that of PA-12.  The combination of both in 6/12 copolymer
                                                                       4
            shows that this relation of values also holds for copolymer (Figure 11.5).  The lower the
            value of either the crystallinity or the elastic modulus the higher the coefficient of friction
            as measured by with rotational rheometer with tribology cell arrangement given in Figure
                4
            11.6.
                Coefficient of friction and transfer film formation were investigated by varying sur-
            face  texture  and  roughness  features  of  ultra  high  molecular  weight  polyethylene  pins
                                                               5
            against steel plates using an inclined pin-on-plate sliding tester.  The transfer film forma-
            tion of UHMWPE on steel material surface depends on the coefficient of friction (depen-
                                                 5
            dent on the texture of harder material surface).  The surface texture was influenced by the
            coefficient of friction because of the variation of the hysteresis of friction components of
                          5
            different surfaces.
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180