Page 346 - Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production Second Edition
P. 346

Project and Contract Management                                       333




                   Conceptual      Feasibility      Definition         Execution
                     Phase           Phase            Phase             Phase


                    Project        Feasibility     Development        Detailed
                    Initiation      Report            Plan             Design
                     Note


                     40%             25%              15%
                    Estimate        Estimate         Estimate



                                                                      Commitment
                   Approval ?      Approval ?       Approval ?
                                                                       and Control

                         N              N                 N


             Figure 13.8  Cost estimate evolution.


             ventures in terms of the technology and engineering applied. Estimating solely on
             the basis of historical costs can be inappropriate.
                Cost estimates can usually be broken into firm items, and items which are more
             difficult to assess because of associated uncertainties or novelty factor. For example,
             the construction of a pipeline might be a firm item but its installation may be
             weather dependent, so an ‘allowance’ could be included to cover extra lay-barge
             charges if poor sea conditions are likely (Figure 13.8).
                Firm items such as pipelines are often estimated using charts of cost vs. size and
             length. The total of such items and allowances may form a preliminary project
             estimate. In addition to allowances some contingency is often made for expected but
             undefined changes, for example to cover design and construction changes within
             the project scope. The objective of such an approach is to define an estimate that
             has as much chance of under running as over running (sometimes termed a 50/50
             estimate) (Figure 13.9).
                A budget containing a number of 50/50 project estimates is more likely to
             balance than if no allowances or contingencies are built in. However such systems
             should not be abused to give insurance against budget overrun; inflated estimates
             tend to hide inefficiency and distort project ranking. Allowances should generally be
             supported by statistical evidence, and contingencies clearly qualified. Contingency
             levels should normally reduce as planning detail increases.
                Minimum risk estimates are sometimes used to quantify either maximum exposure
             in monetary terms or, in the case of an annual work plan containing multiple
             projects, to help determine the proportion of firm projects. Firm projects are those
             which have budget cover even if costs overrun. A minimum risk estimate is one
   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351