Page 284 - Hydrogeology Principles and Practice
P. 284

HYDC07  12/5/05  5:32 PM  Page 267






                                                          Groundwater pollution remediation and protection  267


                   environmental pathway is to determine the con-  model are combined to provide contaminant source
                   centration of the contaminant at an abstraction site  data that are then used in a pollution risk model to
                   while the exposure pathway assesses the effects of  calculate a probability distribution for the concentra-
                   exposure to contaminated water.             tion of a contaminant at a selected pumped borehole
                     To gain the most efficient use of time and financial  for comparison with water quality standards.
                   constraints, tiered approaches to risk assessment are
                   widely applied. Increasing tiers equate to increasing
                   levels of sophistication with respect to site-specific  7.3.4 Spatial planning and groundwater
                   risk assessment. In general, four levels of assessment  protection
                   can be identified:
                   • Tier 1: Preliminary investigations: qualitative desk  The problem of nitrate and pesticides leaching from
                   study; determination of source–pathway–target  regions of intensively managed arable farming and
                   chains; limited intrusive investigation and sampling.  cattle grazing affects wide areas of western Europe
                   • Tier 2: Site characterization: semiquantitative; some  and other regions of the world and it has become
                   intrusive site investigation and sampling; prioritiza-  clear that more stringent controls on land-use activ-
                   tion and screening methods.                 ities, integrated into local and regional spatial planning,
                   • Tier 3: Generic risk assessment: qualitative/semi-  are required if groundwater quality is to improve.
                   quantitative; comparison of estimated contaminant  Such an approach has been applied in the United
                   concentrations with generic guidelines and standards;  Kingdom and Denmark (Box 7.5) and provides
                   assessment of environmental pathway; intrusive   experience for the future formulation of strategies
                   site investigations; computer simulations/modelling;  for reducing the impacts of diffuse groundwater
                   stochastic approaches.                      contamination.
                   • Tier 4: Quantitative risk assessment: use of derived  In England, the Pilot Nitrate Sensitive Area (NSA)
                   contaminant concentrations for exposure pathway  scheme was started in 1990 and by the time of
                   assessment; exposure assessment models; integrated  the Main NSA scheme in 1998, 80% of the land area
                   approaches to risk assessment.              comprising 35,000 ha in 32 catchments was included
                   This type of tiered approach is the basis of the  in this voluntary, compensated agri-environment
                   American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM  scheme. Two levels of payment were offered to
                   2001) standard guide to RBCA (risk-based correc-  farmers entering into the scheme with higher com-
                   tive action) for site investigation and remediation   pensation given under the Premium scheme for
                   at petroleum-contaminated sites, although the pro-  arable land conversion to grass with total nitrogen
                                                                                     −1
                   cess can be applied to any contaminant and release   inputs of less than 150 kg ha . Under the alternative,
                   scenario. The framework has a site characterization  Basic scheme, farmers were paid less for sowing
                   stage followed by a three-tier approach where the  winter cover crops, restricting organic manure inputs
                   human health and environmental risks are equally  and their timing, and limiting nitrogen fertilizer
                   accounted for. As each tier is completed there is an  inputs to below the recommended optimum. Table
                   evaluation to determine if more information is  7.3 summarizes the results of long-term monitoring
                   required. If so, then the next level of assessment is  of the effectiveness of the scheme in the first 10 catch-
                   conducted; if not, then an assessment of the correc-  ments included in the Pilot NSA scheme with respect
                   tive action is required. A tiered approach is also used  to measured soil nitrate losses prior to and during
                   by the Environment Agency in England and Wales in  the scheme. The results indicate an overall reduction
                   the hydrogeological risk assessment of landfills  of about 50% in nitrate concentrations and 28% in
                   (Leeson et al. 2003) as outlined in Fig. 7.10.  nitrogen fluxes leaving the root zone compared to
                     A practical example of a Tier 3 risk assessment is  baseline values. Corresponding values for the further
                   provided by Davison et al. (2002), who presented a  catchments included in the Main NSA scheme are
                   management tool to identify the best use for urban  34% and 16%, respectively, between 1994 and 1996
                   groundwater pumped from a user-defined location.  and 1998 and 2000 (ADAS 2003). Take-up and con-
                   A probabilistic catchment zone model and land-use  version of arable land under the Premium scheme
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289