Page 367 - Integrated Wireless Propagation Models
P. 367

T h e   l e e   C o m  p r e h e n s i v e   M  o d e l -  I n t e g r a t i o n   o f   t h e   T h r e e   l e e   M  o d e l s    345

               60 percent of the measured data. This is fairly good performance in a macrocell
               prediction model.

               6.2.2  Validation of the  i crocell Model
                                      M
               In Sec. 4.2.7, measurement data were collected by different groups in various countries/
               cities for selected applications with unique frequencies, varying transmitter heights,
               and differing cell site parameters within a range of mobile communication environ­
               ments. We must also consider different buildings that have unique shapes with indi­
               vidual heights and widths and built with various materials and different spacing.
               Measurement data were carried out in San Francisco, Japan, and Spain.
                  Comparisons with collected measurement data demonstrate that the model per­
               formed exceptionally well in varying mobile environments with different cell site
               parameters, as shown in Sec. 4.2.7.

                                                       (
               6.2.3  Validation of the In-Building Model  P icocell Model)
               In Sec. 5.2.5, measured data were collected at the Qualcomm building. This set of tests
               examined some special cases in the building, such as the impact of elevators on the
               signal attenuation. LOS, NLOS, single room, and multiple rooms were considered.
                  Figure 5.2.6.1 shows the measured versus predicted charts. More than 85 percent of
               the predicted values were within a delta value of 4 dB.


          6.3   System  Design Aspects  Using Different Prediction M    o dels


                 3
               6. . 1    Preparing to Design a System
               There are many technologies that can help to improve and enhance the COMA net­
               work's  coverage  and  capacity.  However,  the  key consideration is  the  trade-off
               among cost, benefit, and risk. In this section, three different new technologies are
               analyzed and applied to a specific study area. The deployment of a microcell pro­
               vides much enhanced capacity and coverage. The implementation of repeaters can
               improve limited  coverage but lose certain capacities. The masthead low-noise
               amplifier (LNA) improves both the coverage (and with higher sensitivity) and the
               capacity. First, we analyze the benefits from these technologies and then consider
               the trade-off on the cost of improvement on a per-decibel basis. A system design is
               conducted based on the terrain and ETAK data. Then the design criteria and link
               budgets are analyzed and balanced. The Lee propagation model was applied to
               come up with radio coverage plots from each cell site within the study area. Then
               the  COMA coverage  plots  (Ec/10  and  E/10)  for forward  and  reverse  links  are
               derived. Based on these plots, the analysis on effects of applying these new tech­
               nologies can be further studied and compared. As shown from these studies, each
               technology has its own pros and cons.
                  The goal here is to study the modeled design and applying the new technology to
               see if there are any of the following:
                   •  Performance improvement
                   •  Reduction of capital without affecting the service
                   •  Associated cost and risk
   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372