Page 235 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 235

Workflow Automation and Intelligent Control                  185


              the engineers can update the nodal analysis model and compare the result
              with the previous available test analysis and identify significant changes in
              IPR or VLP. On the basis of our work on this project, we know that the
              automated workflow can tune the model parameters until the acceptable
              error is below 10% between the observed gas rate and f BHP , versus simulated
              gas rate and f BHP . This workflow displays the multiphase flow equation
              through time in an iterative GIS map, which shows several wells with dif-
              ferent correlations. Ultimately, the physical model is used to validate the well
              test. If the well test data matches the well model with an error <10%, test is
              considered validated and accepted; otherwise, the test is rejected and must be
              repeated.
                 However, this automated workflow requires the integration of machine
              learning to memorize previous tuning steps and to be consistent throughout
              the production history. Normally, the tuning process uses basic equations,
              such as Vogel, Darcy, or flow parameters such as c and n factors to calibrate
              the IPR curve. The PEs should have the reservoir pressure, skin, and matrix
              permeability data; however, if this data is not available, the engineers can
              change these properties until there is a minimum error, but sometime these
              changes are meaningless. To avoid meaningless changes, machine learning
              canbeusedtomemorizethechangesinreservoirpressureduringthereservoir
              depletion or provide this value from material balance and numerical models.
                 The diagnostics provided by the automated workflows need to be
              reinforced with expert rules analysis, fuzzy logic, and management-by-
              exception rules. These techniques improve diagnostics of the well trouble-
              shooting and provide accurate recommendations for further action, for
              example:
              •  If the stability check KPI is >0.0, the expert rule recommendation could
                 be to reduce the choke size and stop the test.
              •  If data is frozen, then generate an alarm.
              •  If WC or GOR increases with a multi-rate test, then suggest the best
                 choke size.
              •  If gas rate and f BHP do not match, then tune the multiphase flow
                 correlation.


                   5.6 DIAGNOSTICS AND PROACTIVE WELL
                       OPTIMIZATION WITH A WELL ANALYSIS MODEL

                   Diagnostics and well optimization are routine activities performed
              daily by PEs. This section describes typical diagnostics and procedures
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240