Page 272 - Intelligent Digital Oil And Gas Fields
P. 272

222                                       Intelligent Digital Oil and Gas Fields


          multi-Gaussian notation (see Eq. 6.12) using the iterative Gauss-Newton
          method (Le et al. 2015):

                              n                                      1
                                  i
                m i + 1 ¼ m i  β i  m  m pr + C M G T  G i C M G + C D
                                                            T
                                                            i
                                                  i
                                                                      (6.13)
                                                        o
                                 i              i

                             gm  d obs  G i m  m pr
          where i is the iteration index, β i is the iteration step-size in the search direc-
                                                          T        T     -1
          tion, and G i is the sensitivity matrix at m i . The term C M G [GC M G +C D ]
          isusuallyreferredtoastheKalmangain.Thecovariancetermsintheensemble
          update of Eq. (6.13) usually satisfy approximations C MD   C M G and
                                                           e
                       T
          C DD   GC M G , where C MD corresponds to the cross-variance between
          e
                                e
          the vector of model parameters m and the vector of predicted data d, while
          C DD is the auto-covariance matrix of the predicted data.
          e
             While EnKF is generally considered as a robust, efficient, and
          easy-to-implement tool for sequential data assimilation and uncertainty
          quantification, the main disadvantages of the method are the Gaussian
          approximation applied in the model update scheme and the suboptimal
          performance in terms of assimilation convergence when the relations
          between the (reservoir) model parameters and the data predicted by
          the forward estimator (e.g., reservoir simulator) are highly nonlinear.
          These issues may lead to a well-known problem of ensemble collapse,
          which is particularly evident for small ensemble sizes (Jafarpour and
          McLaughlin, 2009). Variants of ensemble design and update have been
          developed to alleviate these issues through more efficient handling of
          model constraints with Kernel-based EnKF (Sarma and Chen, 2011)as
          well as introduction of subspace EnKF and ES with Kernel PCA param-
          eterization (Sarma and Chen, 2013). The ES also fits the category of
          ensemble-based data-assimilation methods but, in comparison to EnKF,
          which updates both model parameters and the states of the system, the
          ES is an alternative data assimilation method that computes the update
          of global reservoir model parameters in real time, by assimilating all data
          simultaneously. The ES was originally proposed by van Leeuwen and
          Evensen (1996) in an application with an ocean circulation model.
          Skjervheim et al. (2011) and Chen and Oliver, 2013 describe recent
          applications of ES for AHM of reservoir simulation models.
             Emerick and Reynolds (2012, 2013) further propose the ES with the
          multiple data assimilation (ES-MDA) algorithm, which repeats the ES
   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277