Page 230 -
P. 230

Knowledge Application                                                 213



               to be able to trust that the content is valid and should be applied. They are less likely
               to completely overlap in context, so it is likely that knowledge reuse would require
               contact with others knowledgeable about the knowledge object.
                    Expertise-seeking novices are often in a learning scenario. Unlike the previous two
               types of reusers, novices are the most distant or different from the knowledge object
               authors and those experienced with its use. Knowledge intermediaries have a much
               greater role to play here in making sure novices begin by accessing more general
               information (e.g., FAQs, introductory texts, glossaries) before they attempt to apply
               the knowledge object or directly contact those who are more expert in using the
                                                                                       1
               knowledge object. EPSSs and other performance support aids such as e-learning
               modules would also be of great use to such reusers.
                    Secondary knowledge miners are analysts who attempt to extract interesting and
               hopefully meaningful patterns by studying knowledge repository use. They are analo-
               gous to the usage analysts who perform similar roles for a CoP library as discussed in
               chapter 5. They are also analogous to librarians who periodically assess the collective
               holdings of a library, whether physical or digital, to see which items are no longer
               being actively accessed and should perhaps be archived, which have been superseded
               by newer and better best practices, and so forth.
                    Different types of reusers will interface differently with knowledge repositories and
               they will differ in their support needs. Repositories therefore need to be able to per-
               sonalize — either at the extreme of treating each individual differently or at the very
               least, personalizing at the level of a community of practice. Since CoPs revolve around
               organizational and professional themes, it makes sense to partition the global knowl-
               edge repository along similar lines. Careful attention must also be paid to the roles of
               intermediaries needed to develop and maintain the organization ’ s corporate memory.
               Content authors are as vital to successful knowledge application and reuse as are
               container maintainers.


                 Knowledge Repositories
                 Knowledge repositories are usually intranets or portals of some kind that serve to
               preserve, manage, and leverage organizational memory (discussed further in chapters
               8 and 11). There are many different types of knowledge repositories in use today
               and they can be categorized in a number of different ways. In general, a knowledge
               repository will contain more than documents (document management system), data
               (database), or records (record management system). A knowledge repository will
               contain valuable content that is a mix of tacit and explicit knowledge, based on the
               unique experiences of the individuals who are or were a part of that company as well
   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235