Page 118 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 118

Will the well run dry? Developments in water resource planning and impact assessment

                    This ‘ramping up’ of demand through complex infrastructure-utilisation relationships has   105
                 been extensively investigated in sociotechnical literature, where it has been shown that stake-
                 holders prescribe appropriate levels of demand into systems of provision, thus shaping
                 consumer behaviour (e.g. Chappells and Shove 2004). Oversizing water infrastructure systems
                 can therefore be expected to lead to increased use of latent capacity. Hence, seasonality and
                 appropriate sizing are important in a water-constrained environment. LCA as currently
                 deployed has little to say about these interrelations between design and environmental impact
                 outcomes, since the implication of sizing is generally considered to be simple – more impact
                 through more materials and energy used for the oversized system. Moreover, the general
                 assumption is that each unit of consumption is equally valid; indeed, the functional unit is
                 invariably ‘per unit of water consumed’, which does not account for total consumption or
                 types of consumption. There is ample scope to extend LCA in these areas.


                 8.5 Conclusions
                 As society begins to recognise the finite nature of water resources, LCA emerges as a tool to
                 assist development of more sustainable water practices by water supply authorities and water
                 users. Water is handled by LCA in two distinct ways: first, to characterise the potential envi-
                 ronmental impact of any system being analysed; and second, in the analysis of impacts of
                 water supply, management and treatment systems.
                    Water as an indicator of system impact must be interpreted carefully to ensure that real
                 environmental impacts are highlighted. Aggregate water use is an inventory item rather than a
                 direct representation of environmental damage, although the process of LCA, as defined by
                 ISO 14040, states clearly that impact indicators must only be used with interpretation. The
                 potential spectrum of actual environmental impacts can be carefully addressed by a thorough
                 and logically presented interpretation of water indicator results. Although alternative assess-
                 ment methods are available to reduce the need for interpretation, in many cases they can be
                 avoided by expanding system boundaries to capture complicating systems such as other users
                 of the same water resource.
                    The use of LCA to analyse water systems requires a broad perspective and a wide system
                 boundary. The multitude of interactions between water servicing systems requires both supply
                 and treatment systems to be considered when assessing a water saving or enhancing design.
                 Determining the life cycle impacts of water systems requires a detailed understanding of
                 system design, both its infrastructure and operation. Infrastructure designs need to be well
                 documented in order to capture the many materials and installation activities of the system
                 being considered. Detail is also required to understand likely operational impacts, including
                 energy use, material consumption and emissions.
                    In many cases, system infrastructure and operational behaviour are influenced by the
                 seasonal nature of water demand. Understanding seasonality often necessitates detailed mod-
                 elling of water demand and supply capacity. Modelling usually has to be undertaken at a fine
                 time interval to ensure that any shortfalls in system supply capacity are fully comprehended.
                 As indicated above, seasonal water demand fluctuations can have a direct impact on system
                 sizing, driving larger capacity systems than average data would suggest is necessary. Further-
                 more, water supply systems provide a good example of the interdependence between system
                 design and use. Where ‘unlimited’ use is enabled at the turn of a tap or the creation of well-
                 positioned drains, then what is considered to be a ‘normal’ rate of consumption is likely to rise,
                 with boundaries of normality being redrawn irrespective of previous ‘behaviour’ conventions.
                 ‘Drought’ may then lead to these boundaries being (abruptly) redrawn. Thus, drought is at
                 once both a function and regulator of demand and supply systems, and incorporation of such








         100804•Life Cycle Assessment 5pp.indd   105                                      17/02/09   12:46:21 PM
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123