Page 143 - MEMS Mechanical Sensors
P. 143

132                                                                 Pressure Sensors

                                                         1
                                                          2
                                               E
                                          .
                                     f =1654   ρ ( −ν  2 )    ha  2               (6.36)
                                                  1
                                      n
                    The amount of damping present will depend not only on the diaphragm design
                 but also its packaging and surroundings. As a rough guide, resonant frequencies of
                 typical diaphragms should range between ~80 kHz for a 1-bar device to 575 kHz for
                 a 40-bar device [14]. Higher frequency devices have been developed; for example,
                 the Entran EPIH Micro Miniature range high-frequency pressure sensor series offers
                 a maximum resonant frequency of 1.7 MHz for the 20-bar device [15]. For this
                 series, the pressurized media is in direct contact with the micromachined silicon
                 structure, and therefore it is suitable only for dry gas or some noncorrosive fluid
                 applications. The introduction of a stainless steel barrier diaphragm lowers the reso-
                 nant frequency to 45 kHz for a 17-bar device [16].


                 6.5.2  Piezoresistive Pressure Sensors
                 The piezoresistive nature of silicon makes the use of diffused or implanted resistors
                 an obvious and straightforward technique for measuring the strain in a
                 micromachined silicon diaphragm. The piezoresistive effect of silicon was first
                 exploited by bonding silicon strain gauges to metal diaphragms [7], but this is an
                 unsatisfactory approach given the thermal mismatch between the metal, adhesive
                 layer, and silicon. Diaphragms were first micromachined into the silicon itself by
                 mechanical spark erosion and wet isotropic etching [8]. This was not a batch
                 approach and therefore device costs were high. The use of anisotropic etching, anodic
                 and fusion bonding, ion implanted strain gauges, and surface micromachining have
                 since reduced the size and improved the accuracy of piezoresistive pressure sensors.
                    A cross-section and plan view of a typical anisotropically etched silicon piezore-
                 sistive pressure sensor is shown in Figure 6.15. The diaphragm is etched as described
                 above and the resistors are located along the edge of the diaphragm, one on each
                 side. The resistors are all orientated in the same direction, and therefore, two are in
                 parallel with the maximum strain (R) and two are perpendicular (R ). The change in
                                                 l                           t
                 resistance of each resistor is calculated from (5.10). The piezoresistive coefficients
                 associated with these resistors will depend upon the orientation of the wafer and dia-
                 phragm, the type and amount of doping, and the temperature. Given a (100) wafer,


                                          Etched silicon
                              Implanted   diaphragm



                                                                         R l


                                                                R t
                                         Glass silicon
                                         constraint
                            Drilled or etched
                            pressure port
                 Figure 6.15  Cross-section and plan view of a typical bulk micromachined piezoresistive pressure
                 sensor.
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148