Page 181 - MEMS and Microstructures in Aerospace Applications
P. 181

Osiander / MEMS and microstructures in Aerospace applications  DK3181_c008 Final Proof page 171 1.9.2005 12:05pm




                    Microelectromechanical Systems for Spacecraft Communications    171































                    FIGURE 8.13 Optical test-bed layout to evaluate MEMX micromirror performance under
                    partial pressure. This overall view includes sample test results, including the beam spot on the
                    micromirror and at the CCD output focal plane, as well as the thermal camera image of the
                    micromirror.


                    more than adequate to support application requirements for multiaccess free-space
                    optical terminals on spacecraft or other moving platforms. The presence of air
                    around the device provides viscous damping, allowing for achieving critical damp-
                    ing, which is best for pointing and tracking control as well as stabilizing against
                    platform vibration. Investigation of the amplitude response versus pressure was
                    limited to pressures well above the molecular regime, since we expect the Q would
                    be undesirably high at lower pressures. Furthermore, at very low gas pressures, heat
                    dissipation would be less without the conductive heat transfer effect of the air, and
                    thus should be avoided to prevent damage and possible modification of mirror
                    curvature. Having a controlled pressure envelope around the device also mitigates
                    against humidity and other contamination.
                       Angle sensitivity was initially measured using a quad cell sensor, which for null
                    tracking is satisfactory, as shown in Figure 8.14(b), where the quad output signal
                    was heavily filtered to eliminate read-out noise. Without filtering the noise floor
                    was 20 mV at the quad output, which translates into an equivalent angle noise at the
                    mirror of 1.2 mrad. With filtering we saw much less inherent electrical noise and
                    were unable to measure it with a digital oscilloscope, although ambient air fluctu-
                    ations perturbing the micro-mirror were visibly discernable. Using a CCD array, we
                    were able to measure low frequency (approximately 10 Hz) sine wave inputs down
                    to 360 mrad, but this is not likely to be the actual intrinsic noise floor of the mirror.




                    © 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186