Page 373 - MEMS and Microstructures in Aerospace Applications
P. 373

Osiander / MEMS and microstructures in Aerospace applications  DK3181_c016 Final Proof page 366 1.9.2005 12:56pm




                   366                       MEMS and Microstructures in Aerospace Applications


                   host vehicle. Mission integration and test practices and procedures will be the over
                   arching guidance for all activity in the I&T phase. The I&T phase may provide
                   potentially detrimental handling, storage, and test conditions. Caution should be
                   exercised to assure protection from moisture and contaminants of MEMS devices.
                   The use of red tag items (covers and protective devices) that will be removed
                   prior to flight is encouraged. The provider must be prepared for excessively long
                   storage periods that have been caused by drawn-out flight schedule delays.
                   Although I&T is performed in a controlled environment, conditions during test
                   may change dramatically and storage conditions will be less controlled. Storage due
                   to standdown time of launch vehicles has traditionally varied from 4 months to
                   close to 3 years. 12
                       The qualification test of a spacecraft is a lengthy and demanding process.
                   Besides proving the design, the entirety is demonstrated for the first time. The
                   qualification test sequence normally matches the expected flight sequence: vibra-
                   tion, shock, and thermal vacuum. We may also configure the spacecraft to match
                   the operational sequence by folding the solar array and deployables during the
                   vibration and test and deploying or removing them during thermal vacuum. 13
                       Any susceptibility of the MEMS during these tests should be identified and
                   planned for early. The design may need to have aliveness test points rather than test
                   MEMS out of a vacuum. The whole life cycle must be planned early to prevent
                   problems encountered late in the build.


                   16.7 CONCLUSION
                   The lack of historical data and well-defined test methodologies for the emerging
                   MEMS in space presents a problem for the flight assurance manager, quality
                   engineer, and program manager among others. The well-defined military and
                   aerospace microcircuit world forms the basis for assurance requirements for micro-
                   electromechanical devices. This microcircuit base, with its well-defined specifica-
                   tions and standards, is supplemented with MEMS-specific testing along with the
                   end item application testing as close to a relevant environment as possible. This
                   chapter provides a guideline for the user rather than a prescription; that is, each
                   individual application will need tailored assurance requirements to meet the needs
                   associated with each unique situation.


                   REFERENCES
                    1. Hartzell, A. and Woodilla, D., MEMS reliability, characterization and test, Presented at
                       Reliability, Testing, and Characterization of MEMS/MOEMS, San Francisco, CA,
                       October 22–24, 2001.
                    2. Pfeifer, T. et al., Quality control and process observation for the micro assembly process,
                       Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 30(1), 1, 2001.
                    3. Ermolov, V. et al., MEMS for mobile communications, Circuits Assembly, 13(7), 46,
                       2002.






                   © 2006 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
   368   369   370   371   372   373   374