Page 244 - Machinery Component Maintenance
P. 244

226    Machinery Component Maintenance and Repair




                                                        W     4

                                            cc OVERLAY


                                                  PLOTTING BOARD, TURNED ON ITS SIDE



                                                70

                        Figure 5-43.  Plotting board solution for electric motor movement exercise of  Figure 5-42.










                          As can be seen, regardless of whether we chose to align the motor to
                        the pump or vice versa, we needed to lower the feet considerably-from
                        0.11 1 to 0.484 in. As it happened, the motor feet had only 0.025 in. total
                        shimming, and the pump, as usual, had no shimming at all.
                          Some would shim the pump “straight up” to get it higher than the mo-
                        tor,  and  then  raise the motor  as required. This,  in  fact,  was  first  at-
                        tempted by  our machinists. They had raised the pump about 3/s  in.,  at
                        which  point  the  piping  interfered,  and  the  pump  was  still  not  high
                        enough. By inspection of Figures 5-44 and 5-45, it can be seen that they
                        would have needed to raise it 0.484 in. (or 0.459 in. if all outboard motor
                        shims had been removed).
                          Figure 5-45 shows the solution used to achieve alignment without radi-
                        cal shimming or milling. As can be  seen, our maximum shim addition
                        was .050 in., which is much lower than the values found earlier for sin-
                        gle-element moves. We  could have reduced this shimming slightly by re-
                        moving our .025 in. existing shims from beneath the outboard feet of the
                        motor, but chose not to do so, leaving some margin for single-element
                        trim adjustments. As it turned out, the trimming went the other way, with
                        .012 in. and  .014 in.  additions required beneath the motor inboard and
                        outboard, respectively. This reflects such factors as heel-and-toc effect
                        causing variation in foot pivot centers. This is normal for situations such
                        as  this  with  short  foot  centers and  long  projections  to  measurement
                        planes.
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249