Page 312 - Machinery Component Maintenance
P. 312

294   Machinery  Component Maintenance and Repair
                         IS0 2953  suggests the  solid  roll-type  rotors,  with  the  largest  one
                       weighing 1100 lb. For larger rotors (or even at the 1100 lb level) a dumb-
                       bell-type rotor may be more economical. This also depends on available
                       material and manufacturing facilities.
                         Critical are the roundness of the journals, their surface quality, radial
                       runout of the test mass mounting surfaces, and the axial and angular lo-
                       cation of the threaded holes which hold the test masses. For guidance in
                       determining machining tolerances, refer to the section on Test Masses.
                         Before using a proving rotor, it will have to be balanced as closely to
                       zero unbalance as possible. This can generally be done on the machine to
                       be tested, even if its calibration is in question. The first test (Umar Test)
                       will reveal if the machine has the capability to reach the specified mini-
                       mum achievable residual unbalance, the second test (UR Test) will prove
                       (or disprove) its calibration.
                         Whenever the rotor is reused at some future time, it should be checked
                       again for balance. Minor correction can be made by attaching balancing
                       clay or wax,  since the rotor will probably change again due to aging,
                       temperature distortion or other factors. The magnitude of such changes
                       generally falls in  the range of  a few microinches displacement of  CG,
                       and is not unusual.

                       Test Masses

                         Test  masses  are  attached to  a  balanced proving  rotor  to  provide  a
                       known quantity of unbalance at a precisely defined location. The rotor is
                       then run in the balancing machine at a given speed and the unbalance
                       indication is observed. It  should equal the unbalance value of  the test
                       mass within a permissible plus/minus deviation.
                         Since the rotor with test masses functions as a gage in assessing the
                       accuracy of the machine indication, residual unbalance and location er-
                       rors in the test masses should be as small as possible. The test procedure
                       makes allowance for the residual unbalance in the proving rotor but not
                       for test mass errors. Therefore, the following parameters must be care-
                       fully controlled to minimize errors.

                          1.  Weight of test mass
                         2.  Distance of  test mass mounting surface to proving rotor shaft axis
                         3.  Distance of test mass center of gravity (CG) to mounting surface
                         4.  Angular position of test mass
                         5.  Axial position of test mass

                         Since all errors are vector quantities, they  should be  treated as was
                       done in the error analysis in the section on balancing arbors,  Le.,  ad-
   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317