Page 304 - Marine Structural Design
P. 304

280                                                     Part II Ultimate Strength

                 assumptions  about  the  position  of  the  neutral  axis  for  the  hull  beam  are made  when
                 progressive collapse is analyzed. By using this transformation, the shifting of the neutral axis
                 in the plate elements is also taken into account.
                 The results obtained !?om  this PNM method have been compared with experimental results
                 and  other  numerical  solutions, which  have  experienced  problems  with  plate  and  overall
                 buckling. The comparison appears to be in good agreement with these simple examples.
                 The present PNM method has been compared with experiments that deal with the ultimate
                 longitudinal strength of a tanker. Calculations have been performed with and without initial
                 plate  imperfections. When  disregarding the  plate  imperfections, the  ultimate load  is  16%
                 higher.
                 The calculation of the ultimate longitudinal strength of an existing double hull product tanker
                 is shown. The ratio between the ultimate moment and the plastic moment was compared with
                 an empirical prediction and the results showed to be in good agreement. The result of the
                 analysis is not only the ultimate bending moment, but  is also the ultimate failure mode.  A
                 failure in sagging would be the most dramatic.
                 Finally, the PNM method was used to derive the force-indentation curve for a double-hulled
                 product  tanker  subjected  to  a  concentrated  force  in  the  middle  of  the  side.  The  force-
                 indentation curve derived by  a  quasi-static analysis is  in  agreement with  the  approximate
                 method.
                 This  work  has  shown  that  the  Plastic Node  Method,  along with  the  new  element,  is  in
                 agreement with existing approximate methods for hull collapse loads and moreover, provides
                 much more information about the progressive failure. In this respect, the Plastic Node Method
                 approaches the  general  finite element method  while using a much  simpler element mesh,
                 which is considered to be more efficient.
                 A modified Smith method to compute the ultimate value of the longitudinal bending moment
                 at the midship section was introduced using an effective width formula for the plating. The
                 modified  Smith  method  accounts  for  the  manufacturing  imperfections,  including  initial
                 eccentricity of  stiffeners, the plating’s initial residual stress, and  deflection. The corrosion
                 defect was considered as an exponential time function with a random steady corrosion rate,
                 which is assumed to uniformly reduce the plate thickness. Crack propagation was predicted
                 based  on  the  Paris-Erdogen equation. Crack initiation time and  coating lifetime were also
                 taken into account.
                 An equation for estimating ultimate strength of hull girders was suggested. The hull girders
                 used  in the  ISSC benchmark  calculations by Yao et al  (2000), were used to  examine the
                 accuracy of this equation. It has been demonstrated that the equation provides quite reasonable
                 results and may be useful in estimating the bending moment strength.

                 13.8  References
                 1.   Andersen, T. L.,  (1988), “Ductile and Brittle Fracture Analysis of Surface Flows Using
                      CTOD”, Experimental Mechanics, pp. 188-193.
                 2.   Bai, Y.,  Bendiksen, E.  and Pedersen, P. Temdrup (1993) “Collapse Analysis of Ship
                     Hull”, J. of Marine Structures, Vo1.6, pp. 485-507.
   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309