Page 212 - Mathematical Techniques of Fractional Order Systems
P. 212

Controllability of Single-valued Chapter | 7  201



                   ðnÞ

             since y -y for some f AN F;y  , it follows from Lemma 7.1 that
                                                      ^
                                                  E

                    ρ ðtÞ 2  Ð  t  S α ðsÞx 1 ds 2  Ð t  S α ðt 2 sÞBu ðs; φ 1 y Þds

                            0           0
                                      Ð s
                                             ^
                            t
                         2   S α ðt 2 sÞ  σðs; τ; φ 1 y ÞdWðτÞ dsAΘðN F;y  Þ:
                           Ð

                            0         0       τ   τ
                Therefore Ψ has a closed graph.
                It can be concluded from Step 1 Step 5 together with the Arzela Ascoli
             theorem that Ψ is a compact multivalued map, u.s.c with convex closed
             values. As a consequence of Lemma 7.2, one can deduce that Ψ has a fixed
             point, which is a mild solution of the fractional order system (7.1) (7.2).
             Theorem 7.3: Suppose that the hypotheses ðH 1 Þ 2 ðH 7 Þ hold, then the nonlin-
             ear multivalued fractional stochastic differential equation (7.1) (7.2) is
             approximately controllable on J.
                                              ε
                        E
             Proof: Let x ðUÞ be a fixed point of Φ in B r .By Theorem 7.2 any fixed
                      E
             point of Φ is a mild solution of (7.1) (7.2) under the control function
                 E                                                  ε
             uðs; x Þ and by stochastic Fubini theorem it satisfies, that for some f AN F;x E
                                        h                            i
                    E               b 21      Ð  b  ~      Ð t
                   x ðbÞ 5 ~ x b 2 EðEI1Π Þ  E~ x b 1  φðsÞdWðsÞ 2  S α ðsÞx 1 ds
                                    0          0            0
                                                E
                                    b 21
                         1 E  Ð  t  ðEI1Π Þ S α ðt 2 sÞf ðsÞds
                             0      s
                                    b 21
                                                        E

                         1 E  Ð t  ðEI1Π Þ S α ðt 2 sÞ  Ð    s  σðs; τ; x ÞdWðτÞ ds
                             0      s           0       τ
                Moreover, by hypothesis ðH 7 Þ on F & σ and the Dounford Pettis theo-
                                         E
                                                        E
             rem, one has that the sequences ff ðsÞg and fσðs; τ; x Þg are weakly compact,
                                                        τ
             respectively, in L 2 ðJ; HÞ and L 2 ðLðK; HÞÞ, so they are subsequences still
                        E              E
                                       τ
             denoted by ff ðsÞg and fσðs; τ; x Þg that are weakly converges to say f and σ ,
             respectively, in L 2 ðJ; HÞ and L 2 ðLðK; HÞÞ. Thus, one has


                 E       2              b 21  2           b 21  Ð  b  S α ðsÞx 1 ds : 2
                                           ~
             EOx ðbÞ 2 ~ x b O # 7 EOEðEI1Π Þ x b O 1 E:EðEI1Π Þ
                                        0                 0    0
                                                          2
                                          b 21 ~
                            1 E  Ð b  OEðEI1Π Þ φðsÞO 2  ds
                                 0        0       L 2 ðK;HÞ
                                         b 21
                                                     E
                            1 E:  Ð b  EðEI1Π Þ S α ðb2sÞ½f ðsÞ2fðsފds: 2
                                 0       s
                                         b 21
                            1 E:  Ð b  EðEI1Π Þ S α ðb2sÞfðsÞds: 2
                                 0       s
                                         b 21
                            1 E:  Ð  b  EðEI1Π Þ S α ðb 2 sÞ
                                 0       s
                               Ð    s  E                    2
                            3   ½σðs; τ; x Þ2σðs; τ; x τ ފdWðτÞ ds:
                                0      τ
                                                                       2
                                         b 21
                            1 E:  Ð b  EðEI1Π Þ S α ðb2sÞ  Ð    s  σðs; τ; x τ ÞdWðτÞ ds: :

                                 0       s           0
                On the other hand by hypothesis ðH 6 Þ, for all 0 # s # b the operator
                   b 21
                                                                 b 21
             EðEI1Π Þ -0 strongly as E-0  1  and moreover OEðEI1Π Þ O # 1. It
                   0                                             0
             follows from Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem and the compactness
                           E
                                              1
                                   2
             of S α ðtÞ that EOx ðbÞ 2 ~ x b O -0as E-0 . This proves the approximate con-
             trollability of the multivalued fractional differential equation (7.1) (7.2).
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217