Page 195 - Mechanics Analysis Composite Materials
P. 195

I80                 Mechanics and analysis of composite materials

             Section 3.3. Then, material stiffnesses are given by Eqs. (4.124). The corresponding
             results are also presented in Fig. 4.47.  As follows from this figure, all three models
             give close results for the burst  pressure (which is natural  because   << Sf) but
             different strains.
               The problem of analysis of cracked cross-ply composite laminate was studied by
             Tsai and Azzi  (1966), Hahn  and Tsai (1974), Vasiliev et al.  (1970), Vasiliev and
             Elpatievskii (1967), Reifsnaider (1977), Hashin (1987) and many other authors. In
             spite of this, the topic is still receiving repeated attention in the literature (Lungren
             and  Gudmundson,  1999). Taking  into account  that  matrix degradation  leads to
             reduction  of  material  stiffness and  fatigue strength,  absorption  of  moisture and
             many other consequences that can be hardly predicted but are definitely undesirable
             it is surprising how many efforts were undertaken to study this phenomenon rather
             than to avoid it. At the first glance, the problem looks simple - all we  need is  to
             synthesize unidirectional composite whose ultimate elongations along and across
             the fibers, i.e.,  El  and E2,  are the same. Actually, the problem is even more simple,
             because E2  can be less than 81 by  the factor that is equal to the safety factor of the
             structure. This means that matrix degradation can occur but at the load that exceeds
             the operational level (safety factor is the ratio of the failure load to the operational
             load and can vary from  1.25 up to 3 and more depending on the application of a
             composite structure). Returning to Table 4.2 in which El  and & are given for typical
             advanced composites we  can  see  that  El  > E;!  for  all  the  materials and  that  for
             polymeric matrices the problem could be, in principle, solved if we could increase E2
             up to about 1%.
               Two main circumstances hinder the direct solution of this problem. The first is
             that being locked between the fibers, the matrix does not show the high elongation
             that  it  has  under  uniaxial tension and behaves as a  brittle material (see Section
             3.4.2). To study this effect, epoxy resins were modified to have different ultimate
             elongations. The corresponding curves are presented in Fig. 4.48  (only the initial
             part of curve 4 is shown in this figure, the ultimate elongation of this resin is 60%).
             Fiberglass composites that  were  fabricated  with  these  resins  were  tested  under
             transverse tension. As can be seen in Fig. 4.49, the desired value of E2  (that is about
              1%) is reached if the matrix elongation is about 60%. However, the stiffness of this














                                      0          I   ,4  ,,60%
                                       0   4   8   12  16   20Em’?
                 Fig. 4.48.  Stress-strain curves for epoxy matrices modified for diff‘erent ultimate elongations.
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200