Page 384 - Mechanics of Asphalt Microstructure and Micromechanics
P. 384

376   Ch a p t e r  E l ev e n


                         0.7                 y(lab) = -0.0447x + 0.9706
                       Normalized modulus  0.5  Field    y(field) = -0.0466x + 0.9769
                         0.6
                                                   2
                                                  R  = 0.9306

                                                               2
                                                              R  = 0.9044
                         0.4
                                  Lab
                                  Linear (Field)
                         0.3
                                  Linear (Lab)
                         0.2
                            6       8      10      12      14      16      18
                                                Air Void, %
              FIGURE 11.10  Normalized modulus versus air-void levels on DEM models from laboratory and
              fi eld specimens (courtesy Zhanping You).


                 You recently used a relatively simple model to obtain consistent results with ex-
              perimental observations (Figure 11.10). Through incorporation of the shape and visco-
              elasticity contact models as described before, more realistic results can be obtained.
              Future research in this area can help better understand the compaction mechanism.
                 Through modeling the compaction process using the DEM approach, aggregate
              shapes and particle kinematics during the compaction can be modeled. The differences
              in slopes of several specially designed mixes (designed to evaluate the binder stiffness
              and temperature effects, aggregate gradation effects, and aggregate shape, angularity,
              and texture effects) can provide the calibrations of the K g , K m,  and K b .


        11.3 Field Compaction

              11.3.1  Macro Constitutive Models—Porous Viscoplasticity Model
              There are few studies in the continuum regime for investigating the compaction mecha-
              nisms. The use of mixture theory, to a certain degree, explains void reduction during
              the compaction process. One of the more popular methods is using a viscoplasticity
              model in conjunction with FEM numerical simulations. Huerne (2004) investigated the
              simulation of the compaction process with an analogy between hot asphalt mixtures
              and wet soils. A critical state soil mechanics model (Wood, 1990) was used as a funda-
              mental model to describe the behavior of asphalt mixture in his study. He analyzed the
              influence of the compaction rate on mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures with the
              help of FEM simulation. A non-standard FEM approach, the arbitrary Lagrangian Eule-
              rian (ALE) method, was used to simulate the behavior of mixture during compaction
              considering the fact that the behavior of the material during this stage is between a
              solid and a liquid (Huerne, 2004).
                 The compaction process involves large irrecoverable deformations. It is also rate
              dependent. Therefore, it requires typically the viscoplasticity models. Quite a few vis-
              coplascity models have been proposed in recent years to model the properties of AC
              (see the references in Chapter 7 and Chapter 10). The parallel layer model (Kichenin
   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389