Page 163 - Mechatronics for Safety, Security and Dependability in a New Era
P. 163

Ch30-I044963.fm  Page 147  Thursday, July 27, 2006  7:17 AM
                      Page 147
                            Thursday, July 27, 2006
                                          7:17 AM
            Ch30-I044963.fm
                                                                                          147
                                                                                          147
                                                            - =  C'A,                     (5)
                                                 1 * 1  CO  dt
                 As  mentioned  above,  six components  of  acceleration  and  angular  acceleration  can be  calculated  from
                 measured  accelerations  along  the  direction  of  each  link  by  using  constant  coefficient  matrix  C  in
                 advance.
                 CALCULATING OPTIMUM STRUCTURAL      PARAMETER

                 The  coefficient  matrix  C should  be nonsingular  matrix,  and  the  calculation  results  tend  to come under
                 the  influence  of  misalignment  and  measurement  errors  of  each  sensors  when  the  matrix  C  is  near
                 singular  point.  Since  we  use  that  platform  as  not  an  actuator  but  a  base  structure  of  measuring
                 instrument,  we  found  the  optimal  structure  based  on  Stewart  Platform  to  reduce  the  influence  of
                 misalignment.  Two  plates  are  in  a  direction  parallel  each  other.  The  centerline,  which  connects
                 centers  of  plate,  is  vertical  to  both  plates.  And  nodes  are  placed  evenly  spaced  apart  (120degrees
                 interval).  In  this  time,  we  calculated  normalized  radius  of  upper  plate  'R'  and  normalized  distance
                 between  two  plates  'H'  according  the  centerline,  when  bottom  plate  radius  is  fixed  to  1.  By  adding
                 virtual  error to the  accelerations  of (a,  to) up to  10%, the  set  of calculated  accelerations  (tic, a>c)  from
                 equation  5  and  the  average  of  evaluation  value  S  calculated  from  equation  6  were  obtained.  The
                 optimal  radius  of  upper  plate  R  and the  optimum  distance  between  both plates  H  were  found  out  by
                 making average value of S minimum.

                                                  -a
                                                                                          (6)
                                                  a
                 Calculated  results  were  shown  in  Figure  3.  As  R  and  H  increased  or  decreased  from  the  optimum
                 value,  the  average  of  evaluation  value  S  increased.  Because  the  coefficient  matrix  became  close  to
                 the  singular  point,  the  calculation  results  tended  to  come  under  the  influence  of  added  error.  After
                 searching  optimum  values,  the  optimum  radius  of  upper  plate  R  should  be  0.83  and  the  optimum
                 distance  between  two  plates  H  should  be  0.93.  On  the  optimum  structure  with  these  parameters,
                 angle  made  by  each  link  and  each  plate  was  43degrees.  However,  when  the  detectors  are  in  a
                 manufacturing  process, the  more  simple  of manufacture  and the  reliability  of processing  would  be  our
                 prior  attention.  Therefore,  the  angle  made  by  each  link  and  each  plate  should  be  45degrees,  we
                 decided.  Under  this  condition,  the  semi-optimum  parameters  of  the  structure  were  R=0.81  and
                 H=0.92.














                         10
                             10
                                                                 10         10
                           R[-]  10  10   H[-]
                                                                H[-]
                      Figure 3: Simulation  results on the evaluate function  S to fix the optimum  structure
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168