Page 278 - Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-Use
P. 278

Case studies  247

                           Water for steam   Water m wwd


                           u  (2
                       Main make up             Water in product
                         (79)
                                                Evaporator loses





                                                         Feed stock
                                                           (2)


                                                         Resin make up
                                                            (7 )
                  Figure 5.12  Water mass halaricefor MDFplant in tonnesperdag (1 9 98 data)


         drying process and 18% recycled from the effluent treatment plant which goes to
         make up 60% of the boiler feedwater.
           The two main water quality parameters measured through the plant are COD
         and suspended solids. Some 65% of  the COD is removed prior to the membrane
         plant with the permeate containing 1% of  the raw effluent value and the final
         product water < 1% after carbon polishing. Overall the COD of the plant has been
         reduced from an influent concentration of 20  000 mg 1-1  down to < 200 mg I-'
         post  activated  carbon.  Almost  all  the  suspended  solids  are removed  in  the
         filter  press  with  a  residual  of  less  than  1 mg 1-1  entering  the  RO  stage.
         Suspended solids in the RO permeates are below limits of detection and the total
         dissolved solids -1. The product water quality is very soft with a total hardness
         concentration  of  1 mg 1-l  and  0.5  mg 1-l  (Ca)  (Table  5.20)  and  contains
         negligible  concentrations of  silica  or sulphate making the water suitable for
         reuse in the (low-pressure) boiler house for steam.
           The  treatment  plant  was  built  under  a  lease-purchase  agreement  where
         Kronospan made an initial payment of €200  000 ($310 200) in February 1996
         and a  final  payment  of  €200  000  ($325 000) in February  1999. Under  the
         contract, Esmil operated the plant for a monthly fee of€22 000 ($33 528; 1998)
         ensuring the treatment of  all wash water effluent to meet Kronospan's  water
         quality  objectives,  up  to  an agreed  daily  maximum. The plant  generates an
         annual saving of  €251 740 ($383 365) of  which the majority  was generated
         from the avoidance  of  tankering the effluent  away (91%) (Table 5.7). Actual
         recycling on the plant produces the remaining savings of which 5.6% come from
         reduced mains water and 3.4% by recovery of raw material. The payback period
         for the initial payment was less than 10 months and Esmil continued to operate
         the plant until autumn of 2002 when Kronospan took over responsibility.
           The scheme was the first plant worldwide to apply such an approach to MDF
         effluent and subsequent plants have been installed across Europe. The scheme at
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283