Page 282 - Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-Use
P. 282

Case studirs  25 1


           Table 5.8  Colour consents
           Wavelength (nm)                 Colour absorbency
                                           Consent                   Typical effluent
           500                              <0.057                    0.094
           5 50                             <0.053                   0.084
           600                              < 0.047                  0.070
           650                              < 0.047                  0.055


           individual textile companies including T. Forsell and Son Ltd together with four
           other discharges in the area.
             The textile plant processes 10 Mg of yarn per day producing a total of  400 m3
           of  effluent. The effluent typically exceeds the colour consent by between 20 and
           80% and  contains high  concentrations of  chromium. The  cost  to  meet  the
           consent is sufficiently high that recovery and reuse of the water becomes a viable
           economic  consideration.  The  company  then  embarked  on  a  pilot  study  to
           establish the most appropriate technology. The criteria outlined were the ability
           to produce reusable water (based on colour and chrome) and the robustness to
           withstand the natural fluctuations in water quality. Four options where tested:

             0  Flocculation
             0  Biological treatment
             0  Advanced oxidation
             0  Reverse osmosis

             Flocculation  is probably  the most popular  form of  effluent treatment in  the
           textile industry. The system trialled  at T. Forsell and Son utilised  a synthetic
           organic  clay with  a high anion exchange capacity. The system was relatively
           simple and suitable for colour removal but was unable to reduce the chromium
           concentration below 3 ppm. The biological system comprised an aerobic reactor
           coupled with UV and hydrogen peroxide capable of  removing 80% of  the COD.
           The plant was relatively inexpensive at €1 SO 000 ($232 650) but was unable to
           remove  chromium.  The  third  option  was  chemical  oxidation  with  ferrous
           sulphate, hydrogen  peroxide, sulphuric acid  and lime. The process  effectively
           removed chromium but retained a high salt concentration in the product water.
           In all the options the final product water was unsuitable  for reuse and so not
           economically feasible. Ultimately a membrane-based technology was selected as
           it enabled reuse of the water and hence recovery of the spent capital.


           5.7.2 Description of plant
           The process train is relatively simple with minimal pretreatment required ahead
           of the reverse osmosis unit (Fig. 5.1 5). The flow initially passes through a 20 pm
           screen prior to being pumped to the RO plant. Concentrate from the process is
           treated with appropriate chemicals and the generated sludge separated out from
   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287