Page 362 - Microsensors, MEMS and Smart Devices - Gardner Varadhan and Awadelkarim
P. 362

342   IDT MICROSENSOR PARAMETER MEASUREMENT





















                       Figure  11.4  SAW device  oscillator  circuit


     Non-AGC  oscillator  circuits,  such  as  the  Brukenstein and  Shay  (see  Smith  el  al.
  (1969)),  are  a  viable  alternative.  These  circuits  feature  high  output  voltage  and  will
  drive under high viscous load conditions. Advantages of their design include fewer circuit
  components making less-possible  noise and drift  sources and are, therefore a much simpler
  and  compact  alternative.


  11.7  ACOUSTIC     WAVE    SENSOR     OUTPUT     FREQUENCY
        TRANSLATION

  Typically,  the  unperturbed  resonant  frequency  of  acoustic  resonators  used  for  sensing
  applications  ranges  between  30  and  300 MHz  for  SAW  devices.  As  sensors,  typical
  sensing  effects  constitute  relatively  small  frequency  deviations  from  their  unperturbed
  resonance,  from  several  kHz  to a few MHz. However, measuring such frequencies in the
  very high frequency  (VHF) and ultrahigh frequency  (UHF) bands requires very expensive
  RF instrumentation.  Therefore,  moves  from  the RF spectrum down to the audio  spectrum
  has  proved  a  popular  alternative.  This  is  achieved  by  a  mixing  process  that  involves
  heterodyning  the  reference  and  sensing  oscillator  frequencies.  A  low-pass  filter  ensures
  that only the difference  frequency  is passed  on. Figure  11.5 shows the schematic diagram
  of  a typical  mixing circuit.
    The circuit consists of a dual-oscillator  system in which the frequency  of each  oscillator
  is controlled  by reference and  sample  resonators.
    The  difference  frequency  f  is the  output  from  the  low-pass  filter

                                  =  (f ref  — f sample)               (11–1)

  Digital  mixing  circuits  offer  a  viable  alternative  to classical  analogue  circuit  techniques
  (Smith  et al.  1969).  The  digital  technique has  advantages  over  analogue  methods  in that
  it  removes  the  need  for  both  the  low-pass  filter  and  the  RF  mixing  transformer.  This
  substantially  lowers  cost  and  size.  However, irrespective  of  whether  analogue  or  digital
  mixing  is  used,  there  will  always  exist  some  finite  difference  frequency  between  the
   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367