Page 331 - Modern Analytical Chemistry
P. 331

1400-CH09  9/9/99  2:13 PM  Page 314





              314    Modern Analytical Chemistry


                                                 14.0
                                                 12.0
                                                 10.0
                                                  8.0
                                                pH
                                                  6.0
                                                  4.0
                                                  2.0
                                                  0.0
                                                   0.00  20.00  40.00  60.00  80.00  100.00 120.00  140.00
                                                                     Volume of titrant
                                              (a)

                                                 14.0
                                                 12.0
                                                 10.0
                                                  8.0
                                                pH
                                                  6.0
                                                  4.0
              Figure 9.24
                                                  2.0
              Titration curves for a 50.00 mL mixture of
              0.100 M HA and 0.100 M HB with 0.100 M  0.0
              NaOH, where (a) pK a,HA = 3 and pK a,HB =8;  0.00  20.00  40.00  60.00  80.00  100.00 120.00  140.00
              and (b) pK a,HA = 5 and pK a,HB = 6. The               Volume of titrant
              dashed lines indicate the location of the two
              equivalence points.             (b)




                                              performing automated titrations, however, concerns about analysis time are less of
                                              a problem. When performing a titration manually the equipment needs are few (a
                                              buret and possibly a pH meter), inexpensive, routinely available in most laborato-
                                              ries, and easy to maintain. Instrumentation for automatic titrations can be pur-
                                              chased for around $3000.


                                               9 C Titrations Based on Complexation Reactions

                                              The earliest titrimetric applications involving metal–ligand complexation were the
                                                                                                       2+
                                                                                                +
                                              determinations of cyanide and chloride using, respectively, Ag and Hg as titrants.
                                              Both methods were developed by Justus Liebig (1803–1873) in the 1850s. The use of
                                                                                  –
                                                                          –
               complexation titration         a monodentate ligand, such as Cl and CN , however, limited the utility of com-
               A titration in which the reaction between  plexation titrations to those metals that formed only a single stable complex, such
               the analyte and titrant is a complexation  –                                                    2–
                                              as Ag(CN) 2 and HgCl 2 . Other potential metal–ligand complexes, such as CdI 4 ,
               reaction.
                                              were not analytically useful because the stepwise formation of a series of metal–
                                                                           –
                                                                +
                                                                                    2–
                                              ligand complexes (CdI , CdI 2 , CdI 3 , and CdI 4 ) resulted in a poorly defined end
                                              point.
                                                  The utility of complexation titrations improved following the introduction by
                                              Schwarzenbach, in 1945, of aminocarboxylic acids as multidentate ligands capable
                                              of forming stable 1:1 complexes with metal ions. The most widely used of these
                                              new ligands was ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, EDTA, which forms strong 1:1
                                              complexes with many metal ions. The first use of EDTA as a titrant occurred in
   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336