Page 279 - Modern Control Systems
P. 279

Section 4.7  The Cost of Feedback                                   253

                        or  10%.  By  contrast,  the  steady-state  error  of  the  closed-loop  system,  with
                        AK/K   =  0.1, is e c(oo)  =  1/91  if the gain decreases. Thus, the change is

                                                   Ae (00)                                  (4 55)
                                                     <    = w ~ h                            -

                        and  the relative change  is

                                                     i  , \ /  =  0.0011,                  (4.56)
                                                     KOI
                        or 0.11%.This  is a significant  improvement, since the closed-loop relative change  is
                        two orders of magnitude lower than that  of the open-loop  system.



       4.7  THE COST OF    FEEDBACK

                        Adding feedback  to a control system results in the advantages outlined  in the previ-
                        ous sections. Naturally, however, these  advantages have  an attendant  cost. The  first
                        cost  of feedback  is an  increased  number  of  components  and  complexity  in  the  sys-
                        tem. To add  the feedback, it  is necessary to consider  several feedback  components;
                        the  measurement  component  (sensor)  is the  key  one. The  sensor  is often  the  most
                        expensive component  in a control system. Furthermore, the sensor introduces  noise
                        and inaccuracies into the  system.
                           The second cost of feedback  is the loss of gain. For example, in a single-loop sys-
                        tem, the  open-loop  gain  is G c(s)G(s)  and  is reduced  to  G c(s)G(s)/(l  +  G c(s)G(s))
                        in  a unity  negative  feedback  system. The  closed-loop  gain  is smaller  by  a factor  of
                        1/(1  +  G c(s)G(s)),  which is exactly the factor  that reduces the sensitivity  of the sys-
                        tem  to  parameter  variations  and  disturbances.  Usually,  we  have  extra  open-loop
                        gain  available, and  we are more  than  willing to trade  it for  increased  control  of  the
                        system response.
                           We  should  note  that  it  is the  gain  of  the  input-output  transmittance  that  is
                        reduced. The  control  system  does  retain  the  substantial  power  gain  of  a  power
                        amplifier  and  actuator, which  is fully  utilized  in the closed-loop  system.
                           The  final  cost  of  feedback  is  the  introduction  of  the  possibility  of  instability.
                        Whereas  the  open-loop  system  is stable, the  closed-loop  system may not  be  always
                        stable. The question of the stability of a closed-loop system is deferred  until Chapter 6,
                        where it can be treated more  completely.
                           The  addition  of  feedback  to  dynamic  systems  causes more  challenges  for  the
                        designer. However, for  most  cases, the  advantages  far  outweigh  the  disadvantages,
                        and  a feedback  system  is desirable. Therefore, it  is necessary  to consider  the  addi-
                        tional complexity and  the problem  of stability when  designing  a control  system.
                           Clearly, we want the output  of the system, Y(s),  to equal the input, R(s).  How-
                        ever,  upon  reflection,  we  might  ask,  Why  not  simply  set  the  transfer  function
                        G(s)  =  Y(s)/R(s)  equal to  1? (See Figure 4.2, assuming T d(s)  =  0.) The answer  to
                        this  question  becomes  apparent  once  we  recall  that  the  process  (or  plant)  G(s)
                        was necessary to provide the desired output; that is, the transfer  function  G(s)  rep-
                        resents  a real process  and  possesses  dynamics  that  cannot  be  neglected.  If  we  set
   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284