Page 209 - MODERN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
P. 209

ION–SOLVENT INTERACTIONS 145





















          activity, entropy, mobility, partial ionic volume, vibration potentials, and dielectric
          constant). There seem to be two interpretations for this marked discrepancy. The first
          is that the spectroscopic methods are relatively insensitive and for this reason are only
          applicable to concentrated solutions. However, here the number of water molecules
          available per ion markedly  decreases   water molecules in a  M solution
          and 10 water molecules in a 5 M solution) so that there would be a mass tendency
          toward lower hydration  numbers (see Fig.  2.46).  Apart from this,  in  solutions as
          concentrated as those used, e.g., in neutron diffraction  for  2:1  salts
          such as     the situation becomes complicated for two reasons: (1) the formation
          of various kinds of ion pairs  and triplets and (2) the fact that so much of the water
          available is part of the hydration sheaths that are the object of investigation. Thus, ionic
          concentration,  which refers conceptually to the number of free waters in which the
          hydrated ion can move, has a different meaning from that when the number of water
          molecules that are tied up is negligible.
             Conversely, spectroscopic methods (particularly NMR and neutron diffraction)
          can  be used to  sense the residence time of the water molecules within the solvent
          sheaths around the ion. Thus, they could offer the most important data still required—a
         clean quantitative determination of the number of molecules that move with the ion.
          Unfortunately  they only  work in concentration regions far higher than those of the
          other methods. A summary of results from these methods is given in Tables 2.23 and
         2.24.


         2.16.4. Why Do Hydration Heats of Transition-Metal Ions Vary
                 Irregularly with Atomic Number?

             The theoretical  discussion of  the  heats of ion–solvent  interactions has been
         restricted so far to stressing the alkali metal and alkaline earth cations and halide
         anions. For these ions,  a purely electrostatic theory  (Section  2.15.10)  provides  fair
         coincidence with experiments.  However, with the two- and three-valent transition-
         metal ions, where directed orbital interactions with water may have more influence,
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214