Page 22 - Multidimensional Chromatography
P. 22

Introduction                                                     11
                           system is much more probable than in a linear system because two displacements
                           similar to that of another component are much less likely than for a single displace-
                           ment.
                              The coupling of chromatographic techniques is clearly attractive for the analysis
                           of complex mixtures, and numerous combinations have been proposed and devel-
                           oped (Figure 1.6). Truly comprehensive two-dimensional hyphenation is generally
                           achieved by frequent sampling from the first column into the second, with a very
                           rapid analysis. The interface is crucial here, and is designed so that components sep-
                           arated in the first dimension are not allowed to recombine; a variety of multiport
                           valving arrangements have been used, but transfer between columns is most efficient
                           if some kind of modulation is employed. The best example so far is the thermally
                           modulated injection of very small samples from a primary GC column into a second
                           GC column (33, 34).
                              More commonly, a fraction, based on chemical type, molecular weight or volatil-
                           ity, is ‘heart-cut’ from the eluent of the primary column and introduced into a sec-
                           ondary column for more detailed analysis. If the same mobile phase is used in both
                           dimensions, fractions may be diverted by means of pressure changes–an approach
                           first used in 1968 in GC-GC by Deans (35), and applied by Davies  et al.  in
                           SFC–SFC (36). If the mobile phases are different, valves are employed, and special































                           Figure 1.4 Two-dimensional plot of HPLC (log  I L ) and GC (log  I G ) retention indexes:
                           (1) naphthalene; (2) 2-methylnaphthalene; (3) 2,3-dimethylnaphthalene; (4) 2,3,6-trimethyl-
                           naphthalene; (5) biphenyl; (6)  fluorene; (7) dibenzothiophen; (8) phenanthrene; (9) 2-
                           methylphenanthrene; (10) 3,6-dimethylphenanthrene; (11) benzo[a]fluorene; (12) chrysene
                           (data replotted from reference (31)).
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27