Page 161 - Neural Network Modeling and Identification of Dynamical Systems
P. 161

4.3 APPLICATION OF ANN MODELS TO ADAPTIVE CONTROL PROBLEMS UNDER UNCERTAINTY CONDITIONS  151
                          system with the compensator under the influ-    The angle of attack reference signal, sup-
                          ence of the traditionally used stepwise reference  posed to be tracked by the control system, was
                          signals. Fig. A.12 shows the operation of such a  constructed by the same rules as the actuator
                          system for a sequence of stepwise reference sig-  command signal during the training set gener-
                          nals, following the intervals during which the  ation for the ANN model. Namely, a random
                          previous disturbance has already been canceled,  sequence of stepwise values of the reference an-
                          i.e., these stepwise effects can be considered iso-  gle of attack was generated, with frequent and
                          lated. This kind of verification of the dynamic  significant differences between adjacent values
                          properties of a controlled system remains essen-  of the elements of the sequence. This approach is
                          tial for the systems of the class considered in this  applied in order to provide the broadest possible
                          chapter since it makes it possible to observe vi-  variety of states of the simulated system (in or-
                          sually and evaluate the nature of the response  der to cover the entire state space of the system
                          of the controlled system when some disturbance  as uniformly and densely as possible), as well as
                          effect occurs.                               the highest possible variety of changes in the ad-
                            However, in the modern practice of the non-  jacent states (in order to reflect the dynamics of
                          linear system testing, instead of isolated step-  the object as accurately as possible in the control
                          wise disturbances, which we use traditionally  algorithm implemented by the neurocontroller).
                          for linear systems, we have to use more complex  See Fig. 4.13.
                          input (reference) signals that allow testing in a  Figs. A.13–A.16 show the operation of a con-
                          much more strict mode. Namely, the input sig-  trol system with a reference model and a com-
                          nal is generated, which often and significantly  pensator for the case when the F-16 aircraft was
                          changes in magnitude, so the control system has  considered as a controlled object and two emer-
                          to start reacting to some ith disturbance even  gency situations happened that led to a shift of
                          before the transient process associated with the  the center of mass of the aircraft, as well as to a
                          reaction to the (i − 1)th (and possibly also to  decrease of the effectiveness of its longitudinal
                          the (i − 2)th, (i − 3)th, ...) disturbance has com-  control.
                          pleted. In other words, with this approach to  Fig. A.17 shows how an adaptive control
                          testing, the system is required to react regularly  system with reference model and compensator
                          not to any single disturbance, but to their combi-  deals with the influence of two consecutive fail-
                          nation (“mixture”), the components of which are  ures, which significantly affect the dynamics of
                          at different stages of the completion of the tran-  the hypersonic research vehicle X-43. The first
                          sient processes generated by them, and this com-  of them leads to a displacement of the center
                          bination is changing randomly. Here, the control  of gravity by 10% (at t = 20 sec), the second to
                          system has to work in much more difficult con-  a 50% decrease in the effectiveness of the lon-
                          ditions than with the traditional stepwise effect,  gitudinal motion control (for t = 50 sec). We
                          but this approach is better suited to the nature  can see that the adaptation scheme provides
                          of the problems arising in the control of non-  operation with a small error (E α ≈±0.05 deg)
                          linear systems operating under uncertainty. For  until the first failure situation occurs. Adapta-
                          example, atmospheric turbulence, affecting the  tion to the change in the dynamics of the object
                          aircraft, will not wait until the control system  caused by this situation occurs quickly enough
                          has fulfilled its previous impact.            (approximately 1.2–1.5 sec). The error has now
                            For this reason, in the examples of testing  become larger (up to the moment of occurrence
                          adaptive control algorithms considered below, a  of the second emergency situation), but it fits,
                          difficult reference signal is used. This input sig-  basically, in the range E α ≈±0.2 deg; the sta-
                          nal usually changes frequently and significantly.  bility of the system operation is preserved. Af-
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166