Page 163 - Neural Network Modeling and Identification of Dynamical Systems
P. 163

4.3 APPLICATION OF ANN MODELS TO ADAPTIVE CONTROL PROBLEMS UNDER UNCERTAINTY CONDITIONS  153
                          well as the different versions of control schemes  and the largest ones, when the reference signals
                          (with or without compensator in one or both  on both channels are random, with a sharply,
                          channels). All experiments were performed for  often and significantly varying amplitude. Such
                          the MRAC scheme. These experiments include   behavior is not usual for an aircraft of the class
                          the following:                               under consideration in its normal flight regimes.
                                                                       It will rather be adequate to some abnormal sit-
                          1. Constant reference g-load n x = 0,random  uation, in which the parameters of the flight of
                            reference angle of attack. Compensators in-
                                                                       the aircraft are changed abruptly and often. But
                            cluded for both channels.
                                                                       even in this rather complicated situation, the
                          2. Constant reference g-load n x = 0,randomref-
                                                                       control system has performed quite successfully.
                            erence angle of attack, there is no compen-
                                                                         In the case when the compensator was used
                            sator in the g-load channel.
                                                                       only for the angle of attack channel, and not
                          3. Constant reference angle of attack (2 degrees),
                                                                       for the g-load channel, the quality of control
                            random reference g-load, compensators in-
                                                                       deteriorated somewhat. Namely, the magnitude
                            cluded for both channels.
                                                                       of the error in this case lies in the range from
                          4. Constant reference angle of attack (2 degrees),
                                                                                                         and from
                            random reference g-load, no compensator in
                                                                       −(0.06 ÷ 0.10) to +(0.05 ÷ 0.08) in n x a
                                                                       −(0.12÷0.60) to +(0.4÷1.2) with respect to α.It
                            the g-load channel.
                                                                       can be seen that the relative error has increased.
                          5. Both reference signals are random stepwise.
                                                                       In particular, the error has increased to a greater
                            Compensators included for both channels.
                                                                       extent for g-loading rather than for the angle of
                          6. Both reference signals are random stepwise.
                                                                       attack. However, the absolute errors remain per-
                            There is no compensator in the g-load chan-
                            nel.                                       fectly acceptable, i.e., the adaptation algorithm
                          7. Both reference signals are random stepwise.  works quite efficiently, despite the complicated
                                                                       conditions.
                            There are no compensators in all channels.
                                                                         The absence of compensators in both chan-
                            The results of the computational experiments  nels is more significant. The error value in this
                          for the abovementioned conditions are shown in  case lies in the range from −0.10 to +0.08 in n x a
                          Figs. A.22–A.35. Since for each of the variants,  and from −1.2 to +2.1 in α.Thus,theroleofthe
                          there are eight graphs, they are divided into two  compensator in the considered adaptive control
                          parts in four graphs for each of the variants. The  scheme is quite significant, but it is not critical.
                          first graph in each pair shows the behavior of the  We can estimate the effect of the change of
                          object, the reference model, and control signals,  the angle of attack on the longitudinal trajectory
                          while the second graph shows tracking errors  motion due to the relation between the angle of
                          and the reference signals.                   attack and the engine thrust from the dynamics
                            The results obtained in this series of exper-  and boundaries of the change in the g-load val-
                          iments allow us to draw the following conclu-  ues n x a .
                          sions. The accuracy of the angle of attack track-  From the results presented in Figs. A.22–A.35,
                          ing when using the extended motion model (4.3)  we can see that the g-load in the case of using
                          is somewhat reduced.                         compensators in both channels lies in the range
                            In the case when the compensator is used   from −(0.03 ÷ 0.15) up to +(0.01 ÷ 0.15),inthe
                          for both channels, the error value ranges from  absence of a compensator in the g-load chan-
                                                            and from   nel in the range from −(0.10 ÷ 0.18) to +(0.10 ÷
                          −(0.02 ÷ 0.04) to +(0.01 ÷ 0.02) by n x a
                          −(0.05÷0.20) to +(0.7÷1.1) with respect to α.In  0.17), and in the absence of compensators in
                          this case, the lowest error values are obtained by  both channels from −0.18 to +0.19.Thus, the
                          maintaining the regime with α = const = 2 deg,  positive effect of the compensators in the con-
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168