Page 167 - Numerical Analysis and Modelling in Geomechanics
P. 167

148 C.L.RAMSHAW AND A.R.SELBY
              The  pile-soil  interface  is  modelled  using  a  surface-based  contact  simulation,
            with  slip  controlled  by  a  Coulomb  friction  model  with  µ=0.1  (Mabsout  and
            Tassoulas, 1994). In order to simulate the horizontal stresses on the pile from the
            soil, the false pile is expanded laterally into the soil by a predetermined distance.
            (This  avoids  the  problem  of  rigid  body  motion.)  Once  the  horizontal  stresses
            have equilibrated, the vertical displacements computed from the pile model are
            applied to the pile shaft nodes of the false pile and the soil nodes immediately
            under the pile toe in a dynamic analysis with time steps of 0.001 s.
              Outward  transmission  of  ground  waves  is  then  computed  using  elastic  soil
            properties. Massarsch (1992) demonstrated that most of the energy is transmitted
            in elastic waves beyond about a pile radius from the pile. Parametric studies of
            site records of arrival times of waves at various distances from the pile indicate
            that  the  dynamic  soil  stiffness  exceeds  the  static  stiffness.  This  has  been
            observed  by  several  workers,  e.g.  Matthews  et  al.  (1996).  An  appropriate  FE
            mesh would typically be a 50×50 mesh of 8-noded quadrilateral elements, each of
            1 m×1 m. One of the more effective boundary strategies is also required, either
            of grouped IEs, or expansion of the FE mesh to allow study of outgoing waves
            without interference from spurious reflections.


                            Calibration of the impact driving model
            Two  sets  of  site  data  are  next  considered.  The  three-stage  procedure  described
            above  was  used,  and  the  parameters  were  adjusted  in  turn,  so  as  to  obtain  the
            best  match  between  computed  and  site  ground  surface  vibrations  in  both  the
            vertical  and  radial  directions.  However,  it  was  anticipated  that  a  perfect  match
            would  never  be  achieved  because  of  the  assumptions  of  a  pure  axial  impact,
            shaft guide location, energy transfer and uniform elastic soils.


                                  Impact driving at the M66
            One of the rare occasions when site data included both pile head force-time, and
            also adjacent ground surface vibrations was observed during dynamic testing of
            driven  cast  in  situ  piles  for  bridge  foundations  on  the  M66  motorway  near
            Manchester.
              Ten  piles,  750  mm  diameter  and  21  m  long,  were  tested  by  the  SIMBAT
            system  (Stain,  1992).  A  concrete  pile  cap  was  cast  and  strain  gauges,
            accelerometers  and  an  electronic  theodolite  target  were  attached.  Signals  were
            recorded during blows from a 2.2 tonne hammer falling through 1.2 m. Ground
            vibrations  were  measured  by  geophones  placed  on  the  ground  surface  at
            distances of 5.5 m, 10 m and 16.5 m. Ground conditions comprised firm to stiff clay
            soils from the surface to 10.5 m depth, underlain by dense sands. Static elastic
                            6
                                        6
            moduli were 13×10  Pa and 24× 10  Pa respectively, but a dynamic soil stiffness
                    6
            of 150×10  Pa was found to be appropriate for dynamic small strains.
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172