Page 291 - Numerical Analysis and Modelling in Geomechanics
P. 291

272 THE 2-D CHEBYSHEV SPECTRAL ELEMENT METHOD

















            Figure  9.4  Snapshots  of  the  acceleration  wavefield  (amplitude)  for  the  point  source
            (indicated  by  a  *  S2  in  the  first  panel)  with  dip  equal  to  65°.  Propagation  times  are
            indicated at the bottom of each panel. Letters mark the main wavefronts: P +  and P −  the
            dilatational and compressional wavefronts of the pressure wave, respectively; S 1  and S 2
            the  shear  wavefronts  of  the  lobes  orthogonal  to  and  in-line  with  the  fault  plane,
            respectively. The quote indicates reflected wavefronts. At model boundaries the wavefield
            is attenuated by the presence of absorbing strips (from Priolo (2001)).
            seen at the receiver on soft soil, as a result of the energy that is trapped within the
            uppermost  layers.  The  response  spectra  confirm  this  analysis,  although  the
            vertical component features a smaller amplification, which is localised in a higher
            frequency band (3–5 Hz).
              A  rather  important  consideration  is  that  the  most  dangerous  frequencies  for
            civil  buildings,  that  is  1.5–4  Hz,  are  amplified  mostly  in  the  horizontal
            components.  They  correspond  to  the  eigenfrequencies  of  a  stack  of  sediment
            layers  about  30–  100  m  thick,  where  the  average  shear-wave  velocity  is  about
            500–600 m/s. On the other hand, the very thin and soft superficial layers (e.g. R 2
            in  Figure  9.6a),  are  too  thin  to  interfere  constructively  with  the  exciting
            wavefield. They just increase the overall amplitude. It follows that, for a reliable
            prediction  of  the  strong  ground  motion,  a  detailed  knowledge  of  the  seismic
            properties of the uppermost layers, down to a depth of about 100–150 m, is of
            crucial interest.
              Finally,  Figure  9.6d  shows  the  maximum  displacement  difference  predicted
            along the transect surface. This quantity may be important for predicting damage
            to  lifelines  and  bridges.  As  expected,  the  largest  values  (about  2.5  cm  for  a
            distance of 50 m) occur at the transition between lava and soft soil.
              No  records  are  currently  available  for  earthquakes  occurring  along  the  fault
            segment  considered  in  this  study.  Therefore,  the  approach  was  validated  by
            simulating  a  nearby  event  which  occurred  recently  (Priolo,  2000).  This
            earthquake is the M5.7 earthquake, which struck Eastern Sicily on December 13,
            1990.  It  is  associated  to  the  rupture  of  the  transcurrent  segment  of  the  Ibleo-
            Maltese  fault,  and  was  recorded  by  the  Catania  station  of  the  ENEA-ENEL
            accelerometric network (CAT in Figure 9.2).
   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296