Page 391 - Organic Electronics in Sensors and Biotechnology
P. 391

368    Chapter  Ten

               like charge (co-ions) are repelled from the surface. This leads to the
               formation of a net electric charge of one sign on one side of the interface
               and a charge of opposite sign on the other side, giving rise to what is
               called the electrical double layer.
               10.2.4  Parameters Influencing EPD
               There are two groups of parameters that determine characteristics of the
               electrophoretic process; one is related to the nature of the suspension and
               the other to the physical parameters, such as the electrical nature of the
               electrode and the amount and time for which the voltage is applied for
                                                    19
                                   18
               the deposition. Hamaker  and Avgustnik et al.  were the first to describe
               the correlation between the amount of material deposited during EPD
               and the different influencing parameters. Hamaker’s law relates the
               deposit yield (w) to the electric field strength E, the electrophoretic mobil-
               ity μ, the surface area of the electrode A, and the particle mass concentra-
               tion in the suspension C through the following equation:
                                        t 2
                                    w = ∫ μ EACdt                   (10.4)
                                        t
                                        1
                   Avgustinik’s law is based on cylindrical, co-axial electrodes, and
               the electrophoretic mobility has been expanded and is represented in
               terms of permittivity ε, the zeta potential ξ, and the viscosity of the
               suspension η:
                                         lEεξ Ct
                                    w =                             (10.5)
                                        3ln( ab η)/
               where  l = length of the deposition electrode
                      a = radius of the deposition electrode
                      b = radius of the co-axial counter electrode (b > a)
                   Biesheuval and Verweij  have considered three different phases
                                      20
               during the deposition process, namely, solid phase, suspension phase,
               and phase having negligible or no solid particles. Both the deposit phase
               and the particle-free liquid phase grow at the expense of the suspension
               phase. By considering the movement of the boundary between the
               deposit and the suspension phases with time along with the continuity
               equation and expression for velocity of particles in the suspension, they 20
                                                                   19
               derived the following equation based on that of Avgustinik et al. :
                                     2πμ lEC   φ
                                 w =       d  .  s  t               (10.6)
                                         /
                                     ln( ab)  φ  − φ
                                              d   s
               where φ = volumetric concentration of particles in suspension
                      s
                     φ = volumetric concentration of particles in deposit
                      d
                     C = mass concentration of particles in the deposit
                      d
                     μ = electrophoretic mobility = εξ/6πη
   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396