Page 184 - Origin and Prediction of Abnormal Formation Pressures
P. 184

DRILLING PARAMETERS                                                  159

               Belotti  and  Gerard  (1976)  discussed  a  similar  system,  which  was  developed  in
            Europe  and  was  successfully  tested  in  more  than  40  wells.  The  system  consisted  of
            a  set  of  sensors  which  acquire  necessary  information  and  transmit  it  to  an  on-site
            data  unit,  where  the  information  is  scaled,  displayed,  recorded  and  processed  by  the
            mini-computer.  Storage  on  magnetic  tape  cassettes  allowed  playback  of  magnitude
            of  overpressure,  porosity,  and  geologic  information  at  desired  depth  intervals  for
            comparative studies with other individual pressure  indicators,  such as well logs.
               Herbert  and  Young  (1972),  using  historical  field  data  from  several  Louisiana  Gulf
            Coast  wells,  developed  equations  based  on  regression  analysis  for  predicting  pore
            pressures.  When  the  results  of  this  analysis  are  applied  to  drilling  data,  the  transition
            from  normal  pore  pressures  to  overpressures  can  be  predicted.  This,  however,  can  be
            done only on  a geographically-regional basis.
               Correlations  between  the  well  log  data  and  rock  drillability  have  been  developed
            by  Gstalder  and  Raynal  (1966)  and  E1-Hadidi  (1970).  Acoustic  transit  time  data  from
            geophysical  well  logs  can  be  used  to predict  rock  drillability,  provided  the  lithology  is
            known.
               The  basic  concepts  of the  SNAP  log  (Lutze  et  al.,  1972)  apply  the  vibrations  from
            the  tricone  bit,  as  measured  at the  Kelly, to  give  an  instantaneous  log  of the  formation
            characteristics while it is being drilled.


            LOGGING WHILE DRILLING

               Methods  have  been  developed  for  recording  the  formation,  mud,  and  bit  data  at the
            bottom  of the  borehole,  and  then transmitting  these  data  to the  surface.  The  great need
            for the development  of additional  energy resources  and ever-increasing  costs  of drilling
            and  exploration,  created  an  incentive  for  developing  methods  providing  downhole
            real-time measurements.  Proposed methods  and granted patents  are numerous.
               Logging-while-drilling  measurement  systems  essentially  perform  only  two  basic
            functions:  (1)  recording  of  the  desired  parameters  at  the  bottom  of  the  wellbore,
            and  (2)  data  transmission  to  the  surface.  Downhole  measurements  comprise:  (1)  well
            control  information,  (2)  directional  drilling  control,  (3)  drilling  optimization,  and
            (4)  formation  evaluation.  Many  different  logging-while-drilling  systems  have  been
            developed.  Basically,  there  are four  different  types  of data  telemetry:  (1)  mud-pressure
            pulses,  (2)  insulated  conductor  or cable,  (3)  electromagnetic  methods,  and  (4)  acoustic
            methods.



            TORQUE
               Torque  variations  are  continually  monitored  at  the  drilling  rigs.  Torque  usually
            increases  gradually  with  depth  due  to  increased  wall-to-wall  contact  of  drillpipe
            and  wellbore.  In  the  presence  of  underbalance  (i.e.,  negative  differential  pressure),
            overpressured  shales  tend  to  flow  or heave  into  the borehole.  Hence,  a  drastic  increase
            in torque may serve as an additional pressure indicator.
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189