Page 182 - Origin and Prediction of Abnormal Formation Pressures
P. 182

DRILLING PARAMETERS                                                   157

            rate as follows:

                 R=GNm(W-Wf)K                                                   (6-4)

            where  a  reciprocal  drilling  constant  (K),  the  weight  intercept  value  (Wf),  and  the  bit
            rotary speed exponent  (m)  are determined by a five-spot drilling test.  G  is a function of
            the normalized bit tooth height.
               Drilling  performance  optimization  and  identification  of  overpressured  formations
            have been also investigated by Wardlaw (1969).
               Several other empirical equations for drilling rate determination have been developed
            by different investigators. Consequently,  field data from  (1)  previously drilled  adjacent
            wells, and/or (2) feedback data from short-interval testing in the subject well are usually
            needed in order to determine input parameters.
               Unfortunately,  drilling  rates  change  with  lithologic  variations,  even  though  the
            pressure  gradient  remains  constant.  Deviated  holes,  severe  dog  legs,  drilling  from
            floating vessels, and frequently occurring water-sensitive and sloughing shales can make
            these indicators questionable.
               Development of fully automated pressure-detection techniques is difficult, except for
            local  geographic  areas  where  the  lithology  is  well  known.  Other  pressure  indicators,
            such  as  chemistry  of  produced  water,  drilling  mud  properties,  density  of  formation
            cuttings, and wireline and related tools must still be used meticulously.



            POROSITY AND FORMATION PRESSURE LOGS
               Several  models  establish the  relationship between  the  formation characteristics  and
            drilling parameters,  and provide an early indication of formation type and porosity and
            pore pressure  variations  (Zoeller,  1970;  Boone,  1972).  Several  service companies have
            made  similar  'data units'  commercially available,  and many oil companies  and drilling
            contractors have developed their own drilling program models.
               For example,  a field example of formation porosity and pressure  logs in an offshore
                                                                                5 inch
            Louisiana wildcat (U.S.A.) is shown in Fig. 6-5 (Fertl,  1976, p.  131).  There is a 9g
            casing seat at a depth of 14,401  ft, which is followed by a fast pressure increase over the
            next 600 ft.
               Bourgoyne (1971)  proposed  a general  equation relating various controllable drilling
            variables and drilling performance, which can be expressed as follows:

                 R  =  K.  fl(W/D),  f2(N)-  f3(H),  f4(Ap)                      (6-5)

            where  R  is  rate  of penetration  (ROP);  K  is  drillability  constant  or  normalized  ROP;
             fl (W/D)  is a function describing the effect of bit weight,  W, per inch of bit diameter,
             D,  on ROP;  fz(N)  is a function defining the effect of rotary speed,  N,  on ROP;  f3(H)
            is a function defining the effect of tooth dullness,  H,  on ROP; and f4(Ap)  is a function
             defining the effect of the differential pressure across the hole,  A p, on ROE
               Normalized  penetration  rate,  K,  is  related  to  the  bulk  density  by  the  following
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187