Page 195 - Partition & Adsorption of Organic Contaminants in Environmental Systems
P. 195

186   CONTAMINANT SORPTION TO SOILS AND NATURAL SOLIDS

           This would have a negative effect on soil remediation and a positive effect on
           soil contaminant uptake or immobilization. Anionic surfactants with large
           charges usually show relatively weak adsorption on mineral soils (Rouse et
           al., 1993). This would seem to make anionic surfactants more desirable for soil
           remediation. Currently,however,available data are insufficient to compare the
           effects of anionic surfactants and other surfactants on the sorption coefficients
           of organic contaminants in soil–water systems.
              The influence of emulsified material on contaminant sorption coefficient
           has been investigated using a PSO surfactant (Petronate L) as reference mate-
           rial (Sun and Boyd, 1993). With naphthalene (S w = 31mg/L), phenanthrene
           (S w = 1.3mg/L), and 2,2¢,4,4¢,5,5¢-hexachlorobiphenyl (2,2¢,4,4¢,5,5¢-PCB) (S w =
           1.0mg/L) as model solutes and Oshtemo silt loam as the reference soil (f om =
                                                                           d
           0.0017), Sun and Boyd (1993) found that with applied X em = 50mg/L the K*/K d
           drops to about 0.02 for 2,2¢,4,4¢,5,5¢-PCB and to about 0.75 for phenanthrene,
           but remains at about 1 for more water-soluble naphthalene (Figure 7.34).Thus,
                                                  (w)                     (s)
           even at low X em, the data indicate that X emK em is much larger than f emK em /K d
           for highly insoluble solutes (high  K d), but the difference decreases rapidly
           with increasing solute S w or with decreasing K d. For an emulsified material in
                                                              (w)
                                                        (s)
           soil–water systems, it is reasonable to assume that K em   K em , since the sorbed
           material on solid surfaces would probably be in a separate phase similar to
           that in water. Therefore, if the emulsified material exhibits only a low-to-
                                                                      (s)
           moderate sorption on a solid (i.e., if f em/X em is not very large), f emK em/K d may
                               (w)
           then be less than X em K em ,or f em/K dX em < 1,for solutes with large K d. For solutes
           of low K d value, the f em/K dX em increases and appears to approach 1 for naph-
           thalene with a mineral soil. Overall, the addition of emulsified materials to
           water for remediation of subsaturated contaminants in soil would be most
           effective for highly insoluble contaminants and presumably for soils with high
           SOM content, both leading to high K d.
              The influence of normal surfactants on K* is expectedly more complicated.
                                                 d
           A few studies with Triton X-100 (TX100), a nonionic surfactant, have been
           reported. Sun et al. (1995) found that the  K*/K d of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
                                                    d
           (TCB) (S w = 18mg/L) on Oshtemo silt loam (f om = 0.0017) increases initially
           at X << CMC, reaches a maximum of about 5 at X ª 2 CMCs and then declines
           slowly thereafter with X; the K*/K d values for highly insoluble 2,2¢,4,4¢,5,5¢-
                                       d
           PCB (S w = 1.0mg/L) and DDT (S w = 5.5mg/L) on the same soil exhibit a
           maximum of 2.4 and 3.3, respectively, at X ª CMC and then decline sharply
           at higher X, with K*/K d ª 0.5 at X ª 2 CMCs (Figure 7.35) (see Table 7.16 for
                            d
           the CMC value). In a similar study, Deitsch and Smith (1995) found that with
           Triton X-100 the  K* of relatively soluble trichloroethylene (TCE) (S w =
                             d
           1100mg/L) on an organic-rich soil ( f oc = 0.24) exhibits no significant change
           over K d up to moderately high X (300mg/L) and that the K* shows a signifi-
                                                                d
           cant reduction relative to K d only at X >> CMC. An obvious consequence of
           the K* –  K d relation is that  K* < K d for all contaminants when  X exceeds
                d
                                      d
           greatly the CMC. This is because the sorption of surfactant to a soil reaches
           the saturation level at some point while the surfactant concentration in water
           (X) increases continuously past the CMC, making (1 + X mn K mn + X mc K mc ) >>
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200