Page 24 - Percolation Models for Transport in Porous Media With
P. 24

1.2  RANDOM CONDUCTIVITIES                                           15


            Since  the formulas  obtained in this  work  assume  no  interflows  between  the
         parallel conducting chains,  the question arises about the accuracy of the results
         obtained.
            Note that in the case of equal conductivities for all conducting channels, formu-
         las of the (1.11) type turn into critical percolation relations E""'  K""' (Pb- P~)d.
         It was  shown in  [29]  that relations of this sort describe with good accuracy  (10
         to 20%)  the  change of network  conductivity  near the critical  point  for  the fol-
         lowing range of the bond conductivity probability, P~ ~ pb  ~ P~ + t::,.pb,  where
          t::,.pb  ~ 0.1.  For a given distribution of conducting bonds with respect to values
         of their intrinsic  conductivities,  verification  of formula  (1.11)  with  a  numerical
         experiment is necessary.
            Numerical  experiment.  In order  to  verify  the fundamental  relationship
          (1.11) obtained above, its results were compared to those of the following numerical
         experiment.  Consider stationary flow  in  an arbitrary medium  described  by the
         elliptic equation
                                       div(uVQ>) = 0.                       (1.12)
            The equation determining the distribution of potential 4>  in a square network
         with a period l

                        2
                      l- [ui+l/2,j(l/>i+l,j- 1/>i,j)- D"i-1/2,j(l/>i,j- 1/>i-l,j)]+   (1.13)
                        2
                    +l- [ui,j+lf2(4>i,j+l- 1/>i,j)- ui,j-lf2(4>i,j- 1/>i,j-1}] = 0
         is  the  difference  analog  of  the  relationship  (1.12).   Here  i  =  1, 2, ... , N;
         j  = 1, 2, ... , N are natural numbers that locate the site in the network; D"i±l/2,j±l/2
         is the intrinsic conductivity of the bond at the point i ± 1/2,j ± 1/2 (set by a ran-
         dom  number  generator);  and 1/>i,j  is  the value of the potential  at the point i,j
         (fig.  2).  Conductivities of bonds were  assigned by  a  random number generator
         provided their probability density was determined by a given function  fo(u).  The
         boundary conditions were as follows


                                     1/>o,j = 1, 1/>N,j = 0,                (1.14)
                              1/>i,N- 1/>i,N-l = 0, 1/>i,l  - l/>i,2  = 0.   (1.15)


            The condition (1.15) requires no flow through the boundary of the network in
         the jth direction, and the condition (1.14) indicates constancy of the potential on
         those boundaries of the network, through which the flow  comes.
            The equation (1.13) has been solved numerically using the relaxation method.
         To speed up calculations, initial distribution was set to be


                                      1/>i,i  = 1- ifN.
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29