Page 27 - Percolation Models for Transport in Porous Media With
P. 27

18                                CHAPTER 1.  PERCOLATION MODEL


         with the mean value of the conductivity of the medium~~ M  =< u  >.  As for
         the one-dimensional case, the effective conductivity is determined from the mean
         value of the inverse conductivity of the medium, i.e., from  the average resistance
         ~ ~< 1/u >-1, and does not coincide with the mean value < u >.
            The dependence of the effective  conductivity of a  medium on the parameter
         K.  defined for the second and third distribution functions by the formula (1.11)  is
         shown  in fig.  3.  The parameters  v,  l,  and 'Y  were  the same as  in the previous
         case.  Fig.  3,  a,  b,  shows  the results of the calculation for  f 0(u)  No.  2,  and fig.
         3,  c,  shows  the results for  f 0(u)  No.  3.  Values  of~ obtained in the numerical
         calculation are marked by circles on the same plots.
            Distribution function  No.  2 differs from the one regularly used in percolation
         theory only in that the non-conducting bonds are substituted in the network with
         the bonds with small, but non-zero conductivities.  Numerical modeling shows that
         introduction of the bonds with small conductivities into the network instead of the
         corresponding "zero" ones changes the nature of the dependence ~(K.) drastically.
            Within the framework of classical percolation theory, where the second term in
         the relation for fo(u)  No.  2 is of the form (1- K.)6(u- 0), the given dependence is
         characterized by a curve resembling the dashed line in fig.  3, b.  After comparing
         the  curves in  fig.  3,  b,  one  can  notice  that although according to the  classical
         theory,  in  the region  K.  ~ P~, ~(K.) = 0,  in the considered generalization of this
         theory, ~(K.) > 0 for all K..  Besides, the behavior of the curves ~(K.) in the interval
         P~ < K.  ~ 1 varies.  This is  most noticeable near K.  = P~.  The plots presented in
         fig.  3 show that satisfactory agreement of the analytical dependence  (1.11)  with
         the results of the numerical experiment does take place.
            Note that the obtained relation {1.11) includes the limiting case (1- K.)6(u-
         w- )  ~ (1-K.)6(u-O). In this case the calculations using (1.11) yield the classical
             1
         percolational relation shown on fig.  3, b,  by the dashed line and described by the
         formula (1.5).


         1.3  Effect  of Electric  Current  on  Conductivity
                 of Heterogeneous Media



         When  electrical current  passes  through  successive  capillaries  of radii  r 1  and r 2
         the ratio of current densities in them is  proportional to (r2/r1 ) 2 ,  while the ratio
         of energy discharge densities is  "' (r2/rt) 4 •  For heterogeneous media, e.g., rocks,
         the ratio  (  r2/ r1)  can be  ~ 10 3  and more.  This fact  shows how  far  from  unifor-
         mity can the energy discharge density be in a medium.  High densities of energy
         discharge in thin capillaries can cause changes to the intrinsic conductivities.  Spe-
         cific mechanisms causing such changes can be very different, e.g., the increase of
         pressure in capillaries, pressure gradients at the micro level,  etc.  Since in actual
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32