Page 290 - Phase-Locked Loops Design, Simulation, and Applications
P. 290

MIXED-SIGNAL PLL APPLICATIONS PART 2: FRACTIONAL-N FREQUENCY
                SYNTHESIZERS   Ronald E. Best                                                          172
                 The signal transfer function is just a delay by one sample. When the input signal is a DC
               level, the same DC level will show up at the quantizer output delayed by one sampling interval
               (T = 1/f ). This means practically that the input signal is transferred to the output with gain 1.
                      F
               The noise transfer function is simply the transfer function of a digital differentiator (difference
               builder)—that is, the output signal at discrete time t = nT is simply the difference e(nT ) − e[(n
               − 1)T ]. When calculating the transfer functions as functions of frequency f, we must simply
               substitute z with e j2πfT  and produce some manipulations



                                                                                           (7.9a)



                                                                                           (7.9b)



                 We are now able to compute to power spectral density of the quantization error at the output
               of the quantizer and digital filter. From this, we can further compute the bit gain of this type of
               A/D converter. In the ideal case, the error sequence e(nT) should be a random noise signal (as
               shown, for example, in Fig. 7.6c). As we will learn very soon, this is unfortunately not true for
               this type of ΣΔ ADC. Later in this section, however, we will introduce some modifications
               that will “randomize” the error function so it becomes more or less “white.” Therefore,
               let’s assume for the moment that  e(nT) is a random sequence;  hence, its  power density
               spectrum becomes flat in the frequency range  −f /2 to  f 2. The power spectrum of the
                                                                  F       F
               quantization error (S ) is depicted in the uppermost trace in Fig. 7.8. To get the power density
                                   ee
               spectrum of the quantization error at the output of the lowpass filter, we must multiply S  by
                                                                                                     ee
               the square of |NTF(f)| and by the square of the transfer function of the lowpass filter, which is
               denoted here by H (f). Hence, we get
                                 lp


                                                                                           (7.10)

                 The second trace in Fig. 7.8 shows the squared absolute value of NTF(f), and the third trace
               illustrates the squared absolute value of H (f).
                                                       lp
                 Performing the multiplications defined in  Eq. (7.10) finally yields the attenuated power
               density spectrum S  at the output of the digital filter, shown in the last trace of Fig. 7.8. This
                                 yy
               result must be compared now with the result obtained for the simple ADC considered earlier
               (cf. Fig. 7.6e). Here, the total noise (that is, the area under the S  spectrum) was attenuated by
                                                                            ee
               the over-sampling ratio OSR. In the case of the  ΣΔ ADC, the attenuation is much larger
               because the gain of the differentiator [NTF(f)] is near zero at low frequencies. The bit gain G
               of the first-order ΣΔ ADC can be shown to be  55



                                                                                           (7.11)

                 To get a bit gain of 15, for example,  we would have to  choose OSR = 1523, which
               compares favorably with the result obtained for the previously discussed
   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295