Page 247 - Physical chemistry understanding our chemical world
P. 247

214    PHASE EQUILIBRIA


                                                Solid
                                  Partial molar Gibbs function (chemical potential m i )  Liquid













                                              T (melt) mixture  T (melt) pure solvent (pure)
                                                    Temperature T
                      Figure 5.18 Adding a chemical to a host (mixing) causes its chemical potential µ to decrease,
                      thereby explaining why a melting-point temperature is a good test of purity. The heavy solid
                      lines represent the chemical potential of the pure material and the thin lines are those of the host
                      containing impurities


                      respective liquid. In fact, when we remember that the chemical potential for a pure
                      material is the same as the molar Gibbs function, we see how this graph (the bold
                      line for the pure host material) is identical to Figure 5.2. And we recall from the start
                      of this chapter how the lines representing G m for solid and G m for liquid intersect
                      at the melting temperature, because liquid and solid are in equilibrium at T (melt) , i.e.
                      G m(liquid) = G m(solid) at T (melt) .
                        We look once more at Figure 5.18, but this time we concentrate on the thinner
                      lines. These lines are seen to be parallel to the bold lines, but have been displaced
                      down the page. These thin lines represent the values of G m of the host within the
                      mixture (i.e. the once pure material following contamination). The line for the solid
                                      mixture has been displaced to a lesser extent than the line for the
              As themolefraction of   liquid, simply because the Gibbs function for liquid phases is more
              contaminant increases   sensitive to contamination.
              (as x i gets larger), so  The vertical difference between the upper bold line (representing
              we are forced to draw   µ ) and the lower thin line (which is µ) arises from Eq. (5.12):
                                        O
              the line progressively  it is a direct consequence of mixing. In fact, the mathematical
              lower down the figure.
                                      composition of Eq. (5.12) dictates that we draw the line for an
                                      impure material (when x i < 1) lower on the page than the line for
                                      the pure material.
                                        It is now time to draw all the threads together, and look at
                                      the temperature at which the thin lines intersect. It is clear from
              A mixed-melting-point   Figure 5.18 that the intersection temperature for the mixture occurs
              experiment is an ideal  at a cooler temperature than that for the pure material, showing
              test of a material’s    why the melting point temperature for a mixture is depressed rel-
              purity since T (melt)   ative to a pure compound. The depression of freezing point is a
              never drops unless the
                                      direct consequence of chemical potentials as defined in Equation
              compound is impure.
                                      (5.12).
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252