Page 248 - Physical chemistry understanding our chemical world
P. 248

PHASE EQUILIBRIA AND COLLIGATIVE PROPERTIES    215

               We now see why the melting-point temperature decreases following contamination,
             when its mole fraction deviates from unity. Conversely, the mole fraction does not
             change at all if the two components within the mixed-melting-point experiment are
             the same, in which T (melt) remains the same.



                                     Justification Box 5.3


                When we formulated the total differential of G (Equation (4.30)) in Chapter 4, we only
                considered the case of a pure substance, saying


                                            ∂G         ∂G

                                      dG =       dp +       dT
                                             ∂p        ∂T
                We assumed then the only variables were temperature and pressure. We must now
                rewrite Equation (4.30), but we add another variable, the amount of substance n i in a
                mixture:


                                     ∂G i       ∂G i        ∂G i
                              dG =        dp +        dT +       dn i           (5.13)
                                     ∂p          ∂T         ∂n i
                We append an additional subscript to this expression for dG to emphasize that we refer
                to the material i within a mixture. As written, Equation (5.13) could refer to either the
                host or the contaminant – so long as we define which is i.
                  The term ∂G i /∂n i occurs so often in second law of thermodynamics that it has its
                own name: the ‘chemical potential’ µ, which is defined more formally as


                                                ∂G i
                                         µ i =                                  (5.14)
                                                ∂n i
                                                    p,T,n j
                where the subscripts to the bracket indicate that the variables p, T , and the amounts of
                all other components n j in the mixture, each remain constant. The chemical potential
                is therefore seen to be the slope on a graph of Gibbs function G (as ‘y’) against the
                amount of substance n i (as ‘x’); see Figure 5.19. In general, the chemical potential
                varies with composition, according to Equation (5.12).
                  The chemical potential µ can be thought of as the constant of proportionality between
                a change in the amount of a species and the resultant change in the Gibbs function of
                a system.
                  The way we wrote ∂G in Equation (5.13) suggests the chemical potential µ is the
                Gibbs function of 1 mol of species i mixed into an infinite amount of host material.
                For example, if we dissolve 1 mol of sugar in a roomful of tea then the increase in
                Gibbs function is µ (sugar) . An alternative way to think of the chemical potential µ is to
                consider dissolving an infinitesimal amount of chemical i in 1 mol of host.
   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253