Page 410 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources

References

1. “ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres),” 12. Bowman, B., U.S. Army, Special Forces Branch, personal
software for dispersions of contaminants in the atmosphere, correspondence.
developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 13. Bray, J., “Political and Security Risk Assessment,” pre-
Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, sented at Pipeline Risk Assessment, Rehabilitation, and
October 1997. Repair Conference, Houston, TX, September 13- 16, 1993.
2. AGA Plastic PipeManual for GasService, Catalog No. XR 14. Briggum, S., Goldman, G. S., Squire, D. H., and Weinberg,
8902. Arlington, VA: American Gas Association, February D. B., Hazardous Waste Regulation Handbook. New York:
1989. Executive Enterprises Publications Co., 1985.
3, American Petroleum Institute, “Evaluation Methodology IS. Brown, J., Collette, P., and Goffred, R., “Utilities Focus on
for Software Based Leak Detection Systems,” API 1155, Cast Iron Management Programs,” Pipeline and Gus
Washington, DC: API, February 1995. Journal, VoI. 222, No. 3, March 1995.
4. American Petroleum Institute, “Pipeline Variable 16. Caldwell, J. C., “Pipe Line Safety Arena;’ Pip Line
Uncertainties andTheir Effect on Leak Detectability,” API Industiy, November 1990, p. 15. California Governor’s
1149, Washington, DC: API, November 1993. Office of Emergency Services, October 2001.
5. “ARCHIE (Automated Resource for Chemical Hazard 17. Cameron, R. M., Halliday. W. S.. and Stryker, R. A.
Incident Evaluation),” prepared for the Federal Emergency “Electromagnetic Surveys of Pipelines and Cathodic
Management Agency, Department of Transportation, and Protection Systems,” PL Risk, September 1993.
Environmental Protection Agency, for Handbook of 18. Canadian National Energy Board, Joint Review Panel
Chemical Hazard Analysis Procedures (approximate date Commission Hearing Order GH-4-2001, “GSX Canada
1989) and software for dispersion modeling, thermal, and Pipeline Project; Application to Construct and Operate a
overpressure impacts. New Natural Gas Pipeline and Related Facilities (in U.S.
6. ASME Code jbr Pressure Piping, B31: “Gas Transmission and Canada),” hearing held in Sidney. British Columbia.
and Distribution Piping Systems,” ANWASME B3 1.8, March 2003.
I986 ed. 19. Clarke, N. W. E., Buried Pipelines, London: Maclaren and
7. ASTM, “Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Sons, 1968.
Testing of Metallic Materials,” E23-93a, American 20. Code of Federal Regulations, Vol. 59, No. 60, “Guidance
Society forTesting and Materialism, July 1993. for Facility and Vessel Response Plans Fish and Wildlife
8. Baker, W. E., et al., Explosion Hazards and Evaluation, and Sensitive Environments,” National Oceanic and
NewYork: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., 1986. Atmospheric Administration, March 29, 1994.
9. Battelle Columbus Division, “Guidelines for Hazard 21. Congram, G. E., “US Utility Expenditures Remain Near
Evaluation Procedures,” New York: American Institute of $6 Billion for 1995.” Pipeline and Gas .Journal. December
Chemical Engineers, 1985. 1994.
9a. Beighle, B., engineering consultant. Benchmark 22. Cornwell, J. B., and Martinsen, W. E., “Quantitative Risk
Engineering LLC, Billings, MT, personal correspondence. Analysis of the Wahsatch Gas Gathering Pipeline System.”
10. Bernstein, F? L., Against the Gods: The Remarkable Stoyv Norman, OK: Quest Consultants Inc.
ofRisk, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1998. 23. Crane Valve Company, “Flow of Fluids through Valves,
I I. Bolt, R., and Logtenberg, T., ‘‘Pipelines Once Buried Fittings, and Pipe.” Crane Technical Paper No. 410. New
Never to be Forgotten,” in Reliabiiity on the Move: Safir?: York: CVC, 1986.
and Reliability in Transportation (G. B. Guy, Ed.), 24. Davis, G., and Jones, D.. “Risk Communication Guide for
London: Elsevier Applied Science, 1989, pp. 195-207. State and Local Agencies,”