Page 412 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources

Referencesi387
66. Norman, R. S. “PE Technology Developments Aid 79. Smart, J. S., and Smith, G. L., “Pigging and Chemical
Industry Safety, Cost Control,” Pipeline Industry, Treatment Pipelines,” presented at Pipeline Pigging and
September 1994. Inspection Technology Conference, Houston, TX,
67. Office of Gas Safety, “Guide to Quantitative Risk February47,1991.
Assessment (QRA),” Standards Australia ME-038-01 80. Southey, R. D., Dawalibi, F. P., and Donoso, E A. “Sharing
(Committee on Pipelines: Gas and Liquid Petroleum), the ROW can Affect Line Integrity,” Pipeline and Gas
Risk and Reliability Associates Pty Ltd., April 2002. Journal, October 1993.
68. “One-Call Systems,” Pipeline Digest, March 1991, p. 15. 81. Stansbeny, R. R., “Usually Sensitive Areas: A Definition
69. Pipeline Industries Guild, Pipelines: Design, for Pipeline Operators,” presented at API Pipeline
Construction, and Operation, London, New York: Conference, Environmental Session, Dallas, TX, 1995.
Construction Press, Inc., 1984. 82. Stephens, M., and Nessim, M., “Pipeline Integrity
70. Playdon, D. K., “Risk Mitigation Strategy Study for Maintenance Optimization-A Quantitative Risk-Based
Alliance Pipeline,” Edmonton, Alberta: Centre for Approach,” presented at API Pipeline Conference, Dallas,
Engineering Research, May 1997. TX, 1995.
70a.Porter, M., A. Baumgard, and K. W. Savigny, “A Hazard 83. Stephens, M. J., “A Model for Sizing High Consequence
and Risk Management System for Large Rock Slope Areas Associated with Natural Gas Pipelines,” C-FER
Hazards Affecting Pipelines in Mountainous Terrain,” Topical Report 99068, prepared for Gas Research
Proceedings of IPC 2002: 4th International Pipeline Institute, Contract 8 174, October 2000.
Conference, Calgary, Canada, September 2002. 84. Sutherland, V., and Cooper, C., Stress and Accidents in the
70b.Porter, M., and K. W. Savigny, “Natural Hazard and Risk Offshore Oil and Gas Industy, Houston, TX: Gulf
Management for South American Pipelines,” Proceedings Publishing Co., 1991.
of IPC 2002: 4th International Pipeline Conference, 85. Tuler, S., et al. “Human Reliability and Risk Management
Calgary, Canada, September 2002. in the Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel,” in Reliability
71. Proceedings of the International Workshop of Offshore on the Move: Safety and Reliability in Transportation (G.
Pipeline Sqfety (D. V. Morris, Ed.), New Orleans, LA, B. Guy, Ed.), London: Elsevier Applied Science, 1989, pp.
December 46, 1991, College Station: Texas A&M 167-193.
University. 86. URS Radian Corporation, “Environmental Assessment of
72. Prugh, R. W., and Johnson, R. W., Guidelines for Vapor Longhorn Partners Pipeline,” report prepared for US. EPA
Release Mitigation, New York: American Institute of and DOT, September 2000.
Chemical Engineers, 1988. 87. U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special
73. Riordan, M. A,, “The IR Drop Paradigm Calls for a Programs Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety,
Change,”PipeLine Industy, March 1991, p. 31-32. “Annual Report of Pipeline Safetyxalendar Year 1988,”
74. RiskAssessment in the Federal Government: Managing the 400 Seventh St., S.W., Washington, DC 20590.
Process, Washington, DC: National Research Council, 88. Vick, Reagan, et al., 1989.
National Academy Press, 1983. 89. Vick, S. G., Degrees ofBelief Subjective Probability and
75. Rohrmann, B., “Verbal Qualifiers for Rating Scales: Engineering Judgment, Reston, VA: ASCE Press, 2002.
Sociolinguistic Considerations and Psychometric Data,” 90. Vincent-Genod, J., Fundamentals ofpipeline Engineering.
Project Report, Melbourne, Australia: University of Paris: Gulf Publishing Co., 1984.
Melbourne, September 2002. 91. Weber, B., DW, personal communications and various
76. Rusin, M., and Sawides-Gellerson, E., The Safety of past project studies.
Interstate Liquid Pipelines: An Evaluation of Present 92. Wheeler, D. J., and Lyday, R. W., Evaluating the
Levels and Proposals for Change, Research Study 040, Measurement Process, 2nd ed., Knoxville, TN: SPC Press,
Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute, July 1989.
1987. 93. Williams, P. J., Pipelines and Permafrost: Ph.vsica1
77. Siegfried, C., “Multiple Uses of ROW for Pipelines,” pre- Geography and Development in the Circumpolar North,
sented at American Gas Association Transmission Reading, MA: Longman, 1979.
Conference, May 18,1971. 94. Wright, T., Colonial Pipeline Company, Atlanta. GA, per-
78. Simiu, E., Reliability ofoffshore Operations: Proceedings sonal communications.
of an International Workshop, NIST Special Publication 95. Zimmerman, T., Chen, Q., and Pandey, M, “Target
833, Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards Reliability Levels for Pipeline Limit States Design,” pre-
and Technology. sented at ASME International Pipeline Conference, 1996.