Page 411 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources

3861 References
25. DIN 2413, DeutscheNormen, Berlin, June 1972. 46. Kelly, K. A,, and Cardon, N. C., “The Myth of lo4 as a
26. Dow Chemical, Fire and Explosion Index Hazard Definition ofAcceptance Criteria,” EPA Watch, Vol. 3, No.
Classlfication Guide, 6th ed., Dow Chemical Co., May 17.
1987. 47. Keyser, C. A,, Materials Science in Engineering, 3rd ed.,
27. Dragun, J., The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials, Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1980,
Silver Spring, MD: Hazardous Materials Control Research pp.75-101,131-159.
Institute, 1988. 48. Kiefner, J. F., “A Risk Management Tool for Establishing
28. Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association, “Polyethylene Budget Priorities,” presented at the Risk Assessment/
EncasementBrochure,”Ply. Tech/l1-92/10M, Birmingham, Management of Regulated Pipelines Conference, a NACE
AL: Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association. TechEdge Series Program, Houston, TX, February lGI2,
29. Esparza, E. D., et al., Pipeline Response to Buried 1997.
Explosive Detonnzioiis. Vols. I and 11, Pipeline Research 49. Larsen, K., et al., “Mitigating Measures for Lines Buried in
Committee Final Report AGA Project PR-15-109, Unstable Slopes,” Pipe Line Industv, October 1987,
Southwest Research Institute Final Report SWRI project pp. 22-25.
02-5567,American GasAssociation,August 1981. 50. Leeds, J. M., “Interaction between Coatings and CP
30. Federal Register Rules and Regulations, Vol. 54, No. 155, Deserves Basic Review,” Pipeline and Gas Industry,
August 14, 1989, pp. 3342e33424, August 30, 1989, March 1995.
pp. 35989-35990. 51. Lockbaum, B. S., “Cast Iron Main Break Predictive
3 1. Flinn, R. A,, and Trojan, P. K., Engineering Materials and Models Guide Maintenance Plans,” Pipe Line Industv,
Their Applications, 3rd ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin, April 1994.
1986,~~. 513-560. 52. Martinez, F. H., and Stafford, S. W. “EPNG Develops
32. Galley, M., Think Reliability, Houston, TX , personal com- Model to Predict Potential Locations for SCC,” Pipeline
munications. Industry, July 1994.
33. Gas Research Institute, “Pipeline Inspection and 53. McAllister, E., Pipeline Rules Thumb, 5th ed., Houston,
Maintenance Optimization Program, PIMOS,” Final Report, TX: Gulfpublishing Co., 1998.
prepared by Woodward-Clyde Consultants, February 1998. 54. Megill, R. E., An Introduction to Risk Analysis, 2nd ed.,
34. Gleick, J., Chaos, NewYork: Penguin Books, 1988. Tulsa, OK: PennWell Books, 1984.
35. Golder and Associates, “Report on Hazard Study for the 55. Memtt, F. S., Standard Handbook for Civil Engineers,
Bulk POL Facilities in the POA Area,” prepared for New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976, Sec. 2 1.
Municipality of Anchorage POL Task Force, August 9, 56. Microsoft Encarta and various Internet sources in the edu-
2002. cation field.
36. “Government Guidelines: State and Federal Regulatory 57. Miller, P. O., et al., “Dealing with Risk,” Canberra,
Briefs,” Pipeline and Gas Journal, May 1995. Australia: The Institution of Engineers, March 1993.
37. Greenwood, B., Seeley, L., and Spouge, J., “Risk Criteria 58. Morgan, B., “The Importance of Realistic Representation
for Use in Quantitative Risk Analysis.” of Design Features in the Risk Assessment of High-
38. Gummow, R., Wakelin, R., and Segall, S., “AC Pressure Gas Pipelines,” presented at Pipeline Reliability
Corrosion-A New Threat to Pipeline Integrity?’ pre- Conference, Houston, TX, September 1995.
sented at ASME International Pipeline Conference, 1996. 59. Morgan, B., etal., “An Approach to the RiskAssessment of
39. Hanna, S. R., and Drivas, P. J., Guidelines for Use ofkpor Gasoline Pipelines,” presented at Pipeline Reliability
Cloud Dispersion Models, New York: American Institute Conference, Houston, TX, November 1996.
of Chemical Engineers, 1987. 60. Moser, A. P, Buried Pipe Design, New York: McGraw-
40. Huges, D., Assessing the Future: Water Utility Infrastructure Hill, 1990.
Management, American Water Works Association, 2002, 61. Engberg, D. J., “Multiobjective Programming Models for
Chap. 12. the Planning of Offshore and Onshore Natural Gas
41. Huges, D., Assessing the Future: Water Uiilitylnfastruciure Pipeline Systems,” Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins
Management, American Water Works Association, 2002, University, Baltimore, MD, 1980.
Chap. 13. 62. NACE, “Recommended Practice: Mitigation of
42. Huges, D.. Assessing the Future: Water Utility Infrastructure Alternating Current and Lightning Effects on Metallic
Management, American Water Works Association, 2002, Structures and Corrosion Control Systems. National
Chap. 23. Association of Corrosion Engineers,” NACE Standard RP-
43. Jaques, S., “NEB Risk Analysis Study, Development of 01-77 (1 983 Revisions), Item No. 53039.
fisk Estimation Method,” National Energy Board of 63. National Energy Board, “Report of the Inquiry: Stress
Canada report, April 1992. Corrosion Cracking on Canadian Oil and Gas Pipelines,”
44. Pluss, C., Niederbaumer, G., and Sagesser, R., “Risk Report MH-2-95. November 1996.
Assessment ofthe Transitgas Pipeline,” Journal of Pipeline 64. National Transportation Safety Board, “Protecting
Integrity, September 2002. Public Safety through Excavation Damage Prevention,”
45. Kaplan, S., “The General Theory of Quantitative Risk Safety Study NTSB/SS-97/01, Washington, DC: NTSB,
Assessment,” in Proceedings of Fph Conference on 1997.
Risk Based Decision Making in Water Resources, ASCE, 65. Naylor, C. E., and Davidowitz, D., “Brittle Behavior of
1991. Pipelines,” 94-DT-016.