Page 84 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources
P. 84

4/62 Corrosion Index























                                       Figure 4.1  Basic risk assessment model

          it does require the injection of energy to slow or halt the disinte-   several different environments, the assessment must allow for
          gration. Corrosion is of concern because any loss of pipe wall   this either by sectioning appropriately or by considering each
          thickness invariably means a reduction of structural integrity   type of environment within a given section and using the worst
          and hence an increase in risk of failure.   case as the governing condition.
           Non-steel pipeline materials are sometimes susceptible to   Several types of human errors can increase the risk from cor-
          other forms of environmental degradation. Sulfates and acids   rosion. Incorrect material selection for the environment (both
          in the soil can deteriorate cement-containing materials such as   internal and external exposures) is a possible mistake. Placing
          concrete and asbestos cement pipe.  Some plastics degrade   incompatible materials close to each other can create or aggra-
          when exposed to ultraviolet light (sunlight). Polyethylene pipe   vate corrosion potentials. This includes joining materials such
          can be vulnerable to hydrocarbons. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC)   as bolts, gaskets, and weld metal. Welding processes must be
          pipe has been attacked by rodents that actually gnaw through   selected with corrosion potential in mind. Insufficient monitor-
          the pipe wall. Pipe materials can be internally degraded when   ing or care of corrosion control systems can also be viewed as a
          transporting an incompatible product. All of these possibilities   form of human error. These factors are covered in the incorrect
          can be considered in this index. Even though the focus here is   operations index discussion of Chapter  6.
          on steel lines, the evaluator can draw parallels to assess his non-   In general, four ingredients are required for the commonly
          steel lines in a similar fashion.          seen metallic corrosion to progress. There must exist an anode,
           As with other failure modes, evaluating the potential for cor-   a cathode, an electrical connection between the two, and an
          rosion follows logical steps, replicating the thought  process   electrolyte. Removal of any one of these ingredients will halt
          that a corrosion control specialist would employ. This involves   the  corrosion  process.  Corrosion prevention  measures  are
          (1) identifjmg the types of corrosion possible (atmospheric,   designed to do just that.
          internal, subsurface), (2) identifying the vulnerability of the
          pipe  material, and  (3)  evaluating  the  corrosion prevention   Three types of corrosion
          measures  used  at  all  locations. Corrosion mechanisms  are
          among the most complex of the potential failure mechanisms.   The corrosion index assesses three general types: atmospheric
          As such, many more pieces of information are efficiently uti-   corrosion, internal corrosion, and subsurface corrosion. This
          lized in assessing this threat.            reflects three general environment types to which the pipe wall
           Some materials used in pipelines are not susceptible  to cor-   may be exposed.
          rosion and are virtually free from any kind of environmental   Atmospheric corrosion deals with pipeline components that
          degradation potential. These are not miracle materials by any   are exposed to the atmosphere. To assess the potential for corro-
          means. Designers have usually traded away some mechanical   sion here, the evaluator must look at items such as
          properties such as strength and flexibility to obtain this prop-
          erty.  Such  pipelines obviously carry  no  risk  of  corrosion-   Susceptible facilities
          induced failure, and the corrosion index should reflect that   Atmospheric type
          absence ofthreat (see Figure  4.2).         Paintingkoatinghnspection program.
           The two factors that must be assessed to define the corrosion
          threat are the material type and the environment. The environ-   For  the  general  risk  assessment model  described here,
          ment includes the conditions that impact the pipe wall, inter-   atmospheric corrosion is weighted as 10% of the total corro-
          nally as well as externally. Because most pipelines pass through   sion threat. This indicates that atmospheric corrosion is a rela-
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89