Page 309 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 309

282                                                              Chapter 16





                 Category   Recovery Period   Operational Phase   Installation Phase probability
                                         probability per year   per operation
                I   1   I    ClYeU     I     c 1 x lo-*   I     c 1 x 10.~    I
                I   2   I    ~  3  ~  - I   <2.5X1U3    I       c 2.5  x 10"'   I
                I   3   I   <loyears   1      1   10'3   1      < 1 x 10"'    I
                I   4   I   >1OYW      I     ~5x10"'    I       c 5 x 10.~    I
           Causes of Loss of Containment incidents considered during the operational phase are:


           0  External Impact (Sinking Vessels, Dropped Objects, Trawl Impact)
           0  Corrosion (External and Internal)
           0  Material Defect

           16.2.5  Financial Risks
           All  incidents considered as initiating in the assessment of  individual and societal risks are
           considered to be initiating for the purposes of determining the Risks of Material Loss.

           In  addition  any  incidents  occurring during  construction  and  installation  and  having  the
           potential to result in damage to andor delay in the construction of the pipeline are considered
           to be initiating with respect to Risks of Material Loss.

           The costs of incidents have been considered as being made up from:


           0  notional cost of fatalities;
           0  cost of repair;
           0  cost of deferred production.

           The expected (average) number of loss of containment incidents and associated fatalities have
           been used to derive an expected annual cost incorporating each of the quantities given above.

           The acceptability  of risks of material loss will be determined using cost benefit analysis. Risk
           reduction measures should be implemented if  cost benefit analysis shows a net benefit over
           the full life cycle.

           To summarize, the acceptance criteria shall be based upon a cost benefit evaluation, where the
           expected benefits must be much greater than the costs of implementing and operating with the
           risk reducing measure, i.e.:
                Cmm~  + COP  CRED                                             (16.1)
           where:
   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314