Page 65 - Plant-Based Remediation Processes
P. 65

3 Metal/Metalloid Phytoremediation: Ideas and Future            53

            modifications), which will possess most traits of plants suitable for phytore-
            mediation. Our knowledge about the theoretical basis of biochemical plant response
            and genetic traits in response to presence of metals in connection with practical
            experiments will be one of the most significant factors affecting fast development of
            phytoremediation. Apart from the plant itself, it will also be essential to properly
            adapt plants to substrate conditions, moisture content as well as their ready appli-
            cability. It is evident that in the search for new strains of bacteria and fungi the
            above described objectives may be attained, in this way contributing to an increase
            of plant biomass, which will constitute a significant factor in the selection of the
            decontamination method of polluted soil. Due to the simultaneously conducted
            work on biological and technical methods, we may expect successive studies
            combining both types of methods. Such a combination will make it possible to
            significantly reduce costs of the method connected with the application of technical
            measures and at the same time will facilitate a shortening of time needed to attain
            required effectiveness of the soil remediation process. The last, but not the least
            concern is associated with the issue constituting a favourite argument for opponents
            of biological methods, which is the claim concerning the impossibility of further
            utilisation of plant materials containing considerable amounts of heavy metals. It
            may be assumed that such methods as phytomining or combustion of contaminated
            biomass in specially designed furnaces may solve this problem.


            References


            Adegbidi HG, Volk TA, White EH, Abrahamson LP, Briggs RD, Bickelhaupt DH (2001) Biomass
              and nutrient removal by willow clones in experimental bioenergy plantations in New York
              State. Biomass Bioenerg 20:399–411
            Ali W, Isayenkov SV, Zhao FJ, Maathuis FJ (2009) Arsenite transport in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci
              66:2329–2339
            Aravind P, Prasad MNV (2005) Cadmium–Zinc interactions in a hydroponic system using
              Ceratophyllum demersum L.: adaptive ecophysiology, biochemistry and molecular toxicology.
              Braz J Plant Physiol 17:3–20
            Arisi ACM, Mocquot B, Lagriffoul A, Mench M, Foyer CH, Jouanin L (2000) Responses to
              cadmium in leaves of transformed poplars overexpressing γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase.
              Physiol Plant 109:143–149
            Barałkiewicz D, Ko ´zka M, Piechalak A, Tomaszewska B, Sobczak P (2009) Application of
              HPLC-ICP-MS and HPLC-MS to determination of Cd and Pb species and phytochelatins in
              pea (Pisum sativum). Talanta 79:493–498
            Becher M, Talke IN, Krall L, Kra ¨mer U (2004) Cross-species microarray transcript profiling
              reveals high constitutive expression of metal homeostasis genes in shoots of the zinc
              hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Plant J 37:251–268
            Belkadhi A, He ´diji H, Abbes Z, Djebali W, Chaı ¨bi W (2012) Influence of salicylic acid pre-
              treatment on cadmium tolerance and its relationship with non-protein thiol production in flax
              root. Afr J Biotechnol 11:9788–9796
            Bernal M, Testillano PS, Alfonso M, del Carmen Risueno M, Picorel R, Yruela I (2007) Identifi-
              cation and subcellular localization of the soybean copper P1B-ATPase GmHMA8 transporter.
              J Struct Biol 158:46–58
            Bernal M, Casero D, Singh V, Wilson GT, Grande A, Yang H, Dodani SC, Pellegrini M, Huijser P,
              Connolly EL, Merchant SS, Kra ¨mer U (2012) Transcriptome sequencing identifies
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70