Page 104 - Practical Control Engineering a Guide for Engineers, Managers, and Practitioners
P. 104

A New  Do11ain  and  More  Process  Models   79


             barely discemable and the lag is almost 90°. Notice that the scales of
             the time axes on these last three plots are different. The first has a
             span of 350, the second 120, and the third has a span of 3.0.
                What is going on? The inertia associated with the mass of liquid
             in the tank (characterized by the tank's time constant) causes the out-
             put flow rate's response to be attenuated as the frequency of the input
             flow  rate increases. At low input frequencies, in spite of the inertia,
             the output flow rate is nearly in phase with the input flow rate and
             there is almost no lag. The slowly varying input flow  rate gives the
             mass of liquid time to respond. As the frequency increases, the mass
             of the liquid cannot keep up with the input flow  rate and the lag
             increases  and  the  ratio  of  output  amplitude  to  input  amplitude
             decreases. Note, however, that the frequency of the output flow rate
             is still identical to that of the input flow  rate. As you might expect,
             and as we will soon show, the phase lag is directly related to the pro-
             cess time constant. Likewise, the attenuation in the amplitude ratio
             depends on the process time constant.
                From the point of view of the flow rates, the tank behaves as a low
             pass filter, that is, it passes low frequency variations almost without atten-
             uation with almost zero phase lag. For high frequency variations it atten-
             uates the amplitude and adds phase lag. Filters as processes or processes
             as filters will be dealt with later on in this chapter and in Chap. 9.

             4-1-2  A Uttle Mathematical Support In the Time Domain
             Let's see if some simple math can "prove" our contentions. Another
             way of writing Eq. (4-2}, ignoring the constant offset value, is

                            U(t) =Au sin(2tr  ft) =Au Re(ei2nftt

                This makes use of Euler's equation that is presented in App. B. It
             simply says that a sine function is the real part of a complex exponen-
             tial function. If this bothers you and you do not want to delve into
             App. B, then you had best skim the rest of this subsection. If  not, then
             temporarily forget about the "real part" and use

                                                                 (4-3)

                This is a common method of control engineers. It  says, "make the
             input flow  rate a complex sinusoid (knowing full well that you are
             only interested in the real part) and use it to solve a  problem; then
             when the solution has been obtained, if it is complex, take the real
             part of the solution and you're home!" The simple algebra of complex
             exponentials is often preferable to the sometimes sophisticated com-
             plexity of the trigonometric relationships.
                 With this leap of faith in hand, feed the expression for U(t) given
              in Eq.  (4-3) into the differential equation describing our simple tank
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109