Page 274 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 274

l           interstitial gas 1s  transferred through the feed end to the A  bed (counter-
 250   PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION   '   PSA PROCESSES                  251

             current), thus rectucmg  the pressure from  PH  to  Pi-
 J       83.  Countercurrent Deoressunzation II. The bed is connected to another B
             bed,  which  1s  undergoing  step  86  and  more  of  the  desorbate  and
             mterstitial  gas  1s  removed  (countercurrently)  through  the  feed  end,
             reducing the pressure  to  P  •
                                   2
         B4.  Countercurrent Deoressurizat10n III. The bed is blown down from  P to
                                                                      2
             atmosohenc pressure, and  the effluent  gas, which contains a  orooort1on
             of the feed  imourities together with  some  hydrogen, 1s  reJectect.
         B5.  Countercurrent Purge. The bed  is  ourged at atmospheric  oressure  with
             high-purity  hydrogen  product  to  desorb  any  impurities  further.  The
             effluent is  rejected.
         B6.  Cocurrent  Pressunzat1on.  The  pressure  m  the  bed  is  raised  to  P 2   by
 +   888     connecting with another B bed undergomg step BS.
 I   o-t-0, .....................  0,00   B7.  Countercurrent Pressurizat10n.  Final  pressurization  of the  B  bed  to  PH
 0
 0-000-0\
 10
             is  accomplished  with  hydrogen  product,  mtroduced  from  the  product
             end.  During  the  later  part  of  this  step  the  B  bed  is  connected  with
 +  +  +     another A  bed  undergoing step A6 and  both  beds are  then  pressurized
 g::gg       to  PH.
 "'  0- 0-
 g:  ~ g:
            The B beds pass through two complete cycies (steps Bl  to B7) while  the A
          beds go through  one cycle  so that  each  B  bed  handles  the  gas from  two  A
          beds during the complete cycle. This  approach  reduces significantly  the size
          of the  B  beds.  A  key  feature  of  this  cycle  1s  that =the  A  and  B  beds  are
          connected  m  senes dunng  the  adsorption  step  but  thev  are  regenerated  by
 00  -  0
 !'-- IO  in   two  entirely  different  sequences.  The overall  performance  1s  sumrnanzect  m
 00 0
 00 0
          Table 6.5.  It 1s  evident  that  the  hydrogen product  has  a  puntv greater than
          99.999% and the fractional  recovery  1s  about 86-87%, while  the CO prod-
                                                                   2
          uct  is  produced  at  a  purity  of about  99.4%  with  about  90%  recovery.  The
          Gemini-8 process gives slightly lower ounty and recovery of CO ,  but there is
                                                              2
          a  significant  reduction  in  the  size  of  the  compressors  and  the  oower  con-
          sumption.
          6.10  PSA Process for Concentrating a  Trace Component

          In  the processes  described  so  far  in  this chapter the objective  has  generally
          been  to produce  a  oure raffinate  product, although  in  some cases  the  more
          strongly  adsorbed  species  (the extract  product)  1s  also  recovered  m  concen-
          trated form.  However,  particularly  m  environmental  applications,  it  is  often
          necessary to  concentrate a  trace  component for  disoosal  or further  process-
          ing_._  Provided that a  sufficiently selective adsorbent 1s  available,  PSA appears
          to be well smtect to such applications, although to date few,  if any,  processes
          of this kind have been commercialized.  Examoles of :two  such processes that
          have  been developed to the pilot plant scale are described  m this section.
   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279