Page 78 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 78

52   PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION   FUNDAMENTALS  OF ADSORPTION          53
          The  dvnam1c  behavior  of  an  adsorprion  column  depends  on  the  interp!av
 Table 2.9.  Kinetic Selectivities for 0  2  /  N Separation at 298K. 0
 2
          between  adsorot1on  kinetics,  adsorption  equilihnum,  and  fluid  dvnam1cs.
 Adsorbent   Ko,!KN,   DoJDN,   aK   However, the overall pattern of the dynamic behav1or· 1s  generally determined
          by  the  form  of  the  equi!ibnum  reiatJonship.  This  pattern  may  be  strongly
 CMS (Bergbau)   I.II   147   12.I
 4A Zeolite   0.28   40   i.75   modified by kinetic effects (finite resistance to mass transfer).  but, in  general,
 RS  JO  (Modified 4A)   0.5   40   3.2   kihet1c  effects  do  not  give  nse  to  qualitative  differences  m  behavior.  It  1s
          therefore  useful  to  consider  first  the  anaiys,s  of  the  dvnam1cs  of  an  ideal
 ~  Kinetic and equilibnum parameiers for CMS and 4A zeolite are lrom Tables 2.4  and 2.7.  Values for   system  with  mfimteiy  rapid  mass  transfer (equilibmim  theory)  an'C1  then  to
 RS-JO  are  trom S.  Farnoq,  M.  N.  Rathor, imd  K.  HidaJal, Chem.  Eng.  Sci. On  press).
          show how the ideal  patterns of behavior are modified m a real  system  by  the
          mtrus1on  of finite  resistance  to mass  transfer.
 selecuv1ty  which  occurs  when  kinetic  and  eouilibnum  seiect1v1t1es  are  m
 opposition  1s  obvious.   2.4.1 . Equilibnum Theory
 A  somewhat  similar  situation  anses  m  kinetically  controlled  PSA  pro-
          The  formal  analysis  of  adsorption  coiumn  dynamics  starts  from  the  basic
 cesses,  which  operate  under  transient  conditions.  When  the  kinetics  are
 controlled  by  a  diffusive  process  (normally  mtracrystalline  or  rnicropore   differential equation derived from  a transient mass  balance on an eiement of
 diffusion),  the uptake, followmg a  step change  in  gas ohase concentratmn,  1s   the column.  If the  flow  oattern  1s  represented  bv  the  axially  disoersed  plug
 given by Eq. 2.39.  For a linear isotherm this reduces, m  the short time region,   flow  model,  this assumes the form:
 to:               a c    iJ      r·  1  - e  \  M'i
                    2
               -DL-, + r;rr! l!C)  +  -- } T  - ()                  (2.47)
                   az  ~ol
 (2.46a)                             E    vi
          If axial  dispers10n  and  pressure  drop  through  the  coiumn  can  be  neglected
 If two  species ( A  and  B) diffuse independently and their isotherms are  also   and  if  the  concentrat10n  of  the  adsorable  species  1s  small,  this  expression
 independent, the  ratio of thetr uptakes at  any time will  be given  by:   reduces to:
 qA/cA \   KA  [Ii;   v-+ - ac   +  -- - -o                         (2.48)
                iJC
                          \'.  1  - E ) iJ{j
 ax=   ( qu/Cu}  =  K V If;;   (2.46b)   az   at   ,   at
 8
          In  the  absence  of mass  iransfer  resistance  local  eauilibnum  prevails  at  all
 This parameter provides  a  usefui  approximate  measure  of the  actual  kinetic   points  (i.e.,  q  =  qf) and  if  the  system  1s  isothermal,  q;*  =  f(c;>,  where  f(c)
 select1v1ty  of the  adsorbent.  in  any  real  system  the  assumption  that  the  two   represents  the  equilihnum  isotherm.  Under  these  conditions  Eq.  2.48  he~
 sncc1cs  diffuse  mdepcndentlv  is  unlikely  to  he  accurately  fulfilled,  hut  Ea.   comes:
 2.46b  ts  still very  useful  as  a  rough  guide  for  mitial  screening  of  kinet1callY
 selective  adsorbents.  It  shows  clearly  that  the  actual  selectivity  depends  on   [v/(i+  (1-e) dq[)]ac + ac  -o   (2.49)
 both  kinetic and eauilibrmm effects.   L   e   de,   az   at
                 I
 Values of aK  for three kinetically selective adsorbents for 0 /N separa-
 2
 2
 tion  are  given  in  Table  2.9.  The  suoenonty  of the  carbon  molecular  sieve   This  eouation  has  the  form  of the  kinematic  wave  ;equation  with  the  wave
          velocity given  by:
 over the zeO!ite adsorbents 1s  clearly apparent. Furthermore, 1t  is evident that
 the  advantage of RS-to compared with  regular 4A zeolite  sterns  from  a  Jess
                                                                     (2.50)
 adverse cauilibnum rather than from any difference in the mtnnsic diffusivity
 ratio.   -
           If the equilibnum  relatwnshio 1s  linear (Q  = Kc),
                                                                     (2.51)
 2.4  Adsorption Column Dynamics
           and  1t  1s  evident  that  the wave  vcJocJty  1s  independent of concentration.  For
 Since  PSA  processes  are  generally  carried  out  with  packed  adsorotion
           an  unfavorable  equilibrium  reiat1onship  (Figure  2.9)  da* /de  increases  with
 columns,  an  elementary  understanding of the dynamic behavior of a  o~cked
           concentration  so  w  decreases  with  concentration,  leading  to  a  profile  that
 adsorbent  bed  1s  an essential  prereqms1te for process modeling and  analysis.
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83